ArticleThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America2018
Comparison of time-frequency methods for analyzing stimulus frequency otoacoustic emissions.
Article in The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- On the Sharpness of Auditory Filters: Considering Subclinical Deficits Reveals Sharper Otoacoustic Emission Estimates of Frequency Selectivity in Humans.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2025Article
- Optimal Scale-Invariant Wavelet Representation and Filtering of Human Otoacoustic Emissions.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2024Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Stimulus frequency otoacoustic emissions (SFOAEs) can have multiple time varying components, including multiple internal reflections. It is, therefore, necessary to study SFOAEs using techniques that can represent their time-frequency behavior. Although various time-frequency schemes can be applied to identify and filter SFOAE components, their accuracy for SFOAE analysis has not been investigated. The relative performance of these methods is important for accurate characterization of SFOAEs that may, in turn, enhance the understanding of SFOAE generation. This study using in silico experiments examined the performance of three linear (short-time Fourier transform, continuous wavelet transform, Stockwell transform) and two nonlinear (empirical mode decomposition and synchrosqueezed wavelet transform) time-frequency approaches for SFOAE analysis. Their performances in terms of phase-gradient delay estimation, frequency specificity, and spectral component extraction are compared, and the relative merits and limitations of each method are discussed. Overall, this paper provides a comparative analysis of various time-frequency methods useful for otoacoustic emission applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.