ArticleToxins2018
True Lies: Using Proteomics to Assess the Accuracy of Transcriptome-Based Venomics in Centipedes Uncovers False Positives and Reveals Startling Intraspecific Variation in Scolopendra Subspinipes.
Article in Toxins, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
26 citing papers in PubMed, 49 citations in OpenAlex.
- Vector venom: venomics of Aedes albopictus reveals a large enzyme repertoire and novel cecropins with activity against E. coli.npj drug discovery · 2026Article
- Article
- Venom gland transcriptomics and bioactivity profiling suggest bifunctional hyaluronidase activity in the venom ofFrontiers in molecular biosciences · 2026Article
- Cnidarian toxins: omics approaches and recombinant proteins.The journal of venomous animals and toxins including tropical diseases · 2025Article
- Enlightening the toxinological dark matter of spider venom enzymes.npj biodiversity · 2024Article
- Selection Across the Three-Dimensional Structure of Venom Proteins from North American Scolopendromorph Centipedes.Journal of molecular evolution · 2024Article
- Function Prediction of Peptide Toxins with Sequence-Based Multi-Tasking PU Learning Method.Toxins · 2022Article
- Venomics of the Central European Myrmicine AntsToxins · 2022Article
- Modern venomics-Current insights, novel methods, and future perspectives in biological and applied animal venom research.GigaScience · 2022Article
- Evolution, Expression Patterns, and Distribution of Novel Ribbon Worm Predatory and Defensive Toxins.Molecular biology and evolution · 2022Article
- Antimicrobial, Insecticidal and Cytotoxic Activity of Linear Venom Peptides from the PseudoscorpionToxins · 2022Article
- Article
- Article
- Article
- Proteo-Transcriptomic Analysis Identifies Potential Novel Toxins Secreted by the Predatory, Prey-Piercing Ribbon WormMarine drugs · 2020Article
- An Economic Dilemma Between Molecular Weapon Systems May Explain an Arachno-atypical Venom in Wasp Spiders (Biomolecules · 2020Article
- Structural venomics reveals evolution of a complex venom by duplication and diversification of an ancient peptide-encoding gene.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020Article
- An Integrated Proteomic and Transcriptomic Analysis Reveals the Venom Complexity of the Bullet AntToxins · 2020Article
- Solenodon genome reveals convergent evolution of venom in eulipotyphlan mammals.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2019Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Centipede venoms have emerged as a rich source of novel bioactive compounds. However, most centipede species are commonly considered too small for venom extraction and transcriptomics is likely to be an attractive way of probing the molecular diversity of these venoms. Examining the venom composition of
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.