Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29495543›Full record

ArticleNutrients2018

Methyl-Donor and Cofactor Nutrient Intakes in the First 2-3 Years and Global DNA Methylation at Age 4: A Prospective Cohort Study.

Rachael M Taylor, Roger Smith, Clare E Collins, David Mossman, Michelle W Wong-Brown, Eng-Cheng Chan, Tiffany-Jane Evans, John R Attia, Tenele Smith, Trent Butler and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nutrients, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Epigenetics, Nutrition, and the Brain: Improving Mental Health through Diet.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Rachael M TaylorPriority Research Centre for Reproductive Science, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW 2308, Australia. rachael.m.taylor@uon.edu.au.
Roger SmithPriority Research Centre for Reproductive Science, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW 2308, Australia. roger.smith@newcastle.edu.au.
Clare E CollinsPriority Research Centre for Reproductive Science, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW 2308, Australia. clare.collins@newcastle.edu.au.
David MossmanHunter Medical Research Institute, 1 Kookaburra Circuit, New Lambton Heights, NSW 2305, Australia. david.mossman@uon.edu.au.
Michelle W Wong-BrownHunter Medical Research Institute, 1 Kookaburra Circuit, New Lambton Heights, NSW 2305, Australia.
Eng-Cheng ChanFaculty of Health and Medicine, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW 2308, Australia.
Tiffany-Jane EvansHunter Medical Research Institute, 1 Kookaburra Circuit, New Lambton Heights, NSW 2305, Australia. tenele.smith@newcastle.edu.au.
John R AttiaFaculty of Health and Medicine, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW 2308, Australia. john.attia@newcastle.edu.au.
Tenele SmithPriority Research Centre for Reproductive Science, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW 2308, Australia. trent.butler@newcastle.edu.au.
Trent ButlerPriority Research Centre for Reproductive Science, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW 2308, Australia. cheng.chan@newcastle.edu.au.
Alexis J HureFaculty of Health and Medicine, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW 2308, Australia. alexis.hure@newcastle.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0003-2225-0986
Hunter Medical Research Institute · AUJohn Hunter Hospital · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDuring the early postnatal period, the impact of nutrition on DNA methylation has not been well studied in humans. The aim was to quantify the relationship between one-carbon metabolism nutrient intake during the first three years of life and global DNA methylation levels at four years.

designChildhood dietary intake was assessed using infant feeding questionnaires, food frequency questionnaires, 4-day weighed food records and 24-h food records. The dietary records were used to estimate the intake of methionine, folate, vitamins B2, B6 and B12 and choline. The accumulative nutrient intake specific rank from three months to three years of age was used for analysis. Global DNA methylation (%5-methyl cytosines (%5-mC)) was measured in buccal cells at four years of age, using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) commercial kit. Linear regression models were used to quantify the statistical relationships.

resultsData were collected from 73 children recruited from the Women and their Children's Health (WATCH) study. No association was found between one-carbon metabolism nutrient intake and global DNA methylation levels (

conclusionNo association was found between the intake of one-carbon metabolism nutrients during the early postnatal period and global DNA methylation levels at age four years. Higher global DNA methylation levels in males warrants further investigation.

Indexed as

DietDNA MethylationChild, PreschoolCholineDietary SupplementsDiet RecordsFemaleFolic AcidHumansLinear ModelsLongitudinal StudiesMaleMental RecallMethionineMouth MucosaNutrition AssessmentCholineFolic AcidMethionineRiboflavinVitamin B 12Vitamin B 6child dietglobal DNA methylationnutritionone-carbon metabolismpostnatal

Identifiers

PMID29495543
PMCPMC5872691
OpenAlexW2792224847

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.