Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29495542›Full record

SynthesisInternational journal of environmental research and public health2018

The Impact of Active Workstations on Workplace Productivity and Performance: A Systematic Review.

Samson O Ojo, Daniel P Bailey, Angel M Chater, David J Hewson

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Workplace Sedentary Behavior and Productivity: A Cross-Sectional Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Executive Function Performance in Young Adults When Cycling at an Active Workstation: An fNIRS Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2019
    Article
  20. Effects of Active Sitting on Reading and Typing Task Productivity.International journal of exercise science · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Samson O OjoInstitute for Health Research, University of Bedfordshire, Luton LU1 3JU, UK. samson.ojo@study.beds.ac.uk.
Daniel P BaileyInstitute for Sport and Physical Activity Research, School of Sport Science and Physical Activity, University of Bedfordshire, Bedford MK41 9EA, UK. Daniel.Bailey@beds.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0003-3772-630X
Angel M ChaterInstitute for Sport and Physical Activity Research, School of Sport Science and Physical Activity, University of Bedfordshire, Bedford MK41 9EA, UK. Angel.chater@beds.ac.uk.
David J HewsonInstitute for Health Research, University of Bedfordshire, Luton LU1 3JU, UK. david.hewson@beds.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-7656-4000

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Active workstations have been recommended for reducing sedentary behavior in the workplace. It is important to understand if the use of these workstations has an impact on worker productivity. The aim of this systematic review was to examine the effect of active workstations on workplace productivity and performance. A total of 3303 articles were initially identified by a systematic search and seven articles met eligibility criteria for inclusion. A quality appraisal was conducted to assess risk of bias, confounding, internal and external validity, and reporting. Most of the studies reported cognitive performance as opposed to productivity. Five studies assessed cognitive performance during use of an active workstation, usually in a single session. Sit-stand desks had no detrimental effect on performance, however, some studies with treadmill and cycling workstations identified potential decreases in performance. Many of the studies lacked the power required to achieve statistical significance. Three studies assessed workplace productivity after prolonged use of an active workstation for between 12 and 52 weeks. These studies reported no significant effect on productivity. Active workstations do not appear to decrease workplace performance.

Indexed as

EfficiencyInterior Design and FurnishingsMovementPostureSedentary BehaviorEmployee Performance AppraisalHumansactive workstationperformancephysical activityproductivitysedentary behaviorsit-standtreadmill desk

Identifiers

PMID29495542
PMCPMC5876962

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.