ArticleGenes2018
Proper Authentication of Ancient DNA Is Still Essential.
Article in Genes, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Inferring diet, disease and antibiotic resistance from ancient human oral microbiomes.Microbial genomics · 2024Review
- A Journey into the Evolution of Human Host-Oral Microbiome Relationship through Ancient Dental Calculus: A Scoping Review.Microorganisms · 2024Article
- Ultraconserved bacteriophage genome sequence identified in 1300-year-old human palaeofaeces.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Studying ancient human oral microbiomes could yield insights into the evolutionary history of noncommunicable diseases.F1000Research · 2023Review
- A Case Study for the Recovery of Authentic Microbial Ancient DNA from Soil Samples.Microorganisms · 2022Article
- Ancient Antibiotics, Ancient Resistance.EcoSal Plus · 2021Review
- Investigating the demographic history of Japan using ancient oral microbiota.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2020Article
- Article
- Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Santiago-Rodriguez et al. [1] report on the putative gut microbiome and resistome of Inca and Italian mummies, and find that Italian mummies exhibit higher bacterial diversity compared to the Inca mummies.[...].
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.