Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29494854›Full record

ArticleGeneral hospital psychiatry

Text messaging to support a perinatal collaborative care model for depression: A multi-methods inquiry.

Amritha Bhat, Johnny Mao, Jürgen Unützer, Susan Reed, Jennifer Unger

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in General hospital psychiatry. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.5field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Financing for Collaborative Care - A Narrative Review.Current treatment options in psychiatry · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Amritha BhatDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States. Electronic address: amritha@uw.edu.
Johnny MaoDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States.
Jürgen UnützerDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States.
Susan ReedDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States.
Jennifer UngerDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States; Department of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States.
University of Washington · US

Funding

Psychiatry Primary Care NRSA T-32 AwardT32MH020021 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI JOHN C. FORTNEY, JURGEN UNUTZER · 1998 to 2026
$5.6M
Reducing Disparities and Improving Care for Depression in OB-GYN ClinicsR01MH085668 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI UNUTZER, JURGEN · 2009 to 2013
$2.3M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH085668NIMH NIH HHS T32 MH020021
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveMental health care integrated into obstetric settings improves access to perinatal depression treatments. Digital interactions such as text messaging between patient and provider can further improve access. We describe the use of text messaging within a perinatal Collaborative Care (CC) program, and explore the association of text messaging content with perinatal depression outcomes.

methodsWe analyzed data from an open treatment trial of perinatal CC in a rural obstetric clinic. Twenty five women with Patient Health Questionnaire-9 score of ≥10 enrolled in CC, and used text messaging to communicate with their Care Manager(CM). We used surveys and focus groups to assessacceptability of text messaging with surveys and focus groups. We calculated the number of text messages exchanged, and analyzed content to understand usage patterns. We explored association between text messaging content and depression outcomes.

resultsCMs initiated 85.4% messages, and patients responded to 86.9% messages. CMs used text messaging for appointment reminders, and patients used it to obtain obstetric and parenting information. CMs had concerns about the likelihood of boundary violations. Patients appreciated the asynchronous nature of text messaging.

conclusionText messaging is feasible and acceptable within a perinatal CC program. We need further research into the effectiveness of text messaging content, and response protocols.

Indexed as

Patient Acceptance of Health CareProfessional-Patient RelationsReminder SystemsText MessagingAdultAppointments and SchedulesDepressive DisorderFemaleHumansIntersectoral CollaborationMaternal Health ServicesPatient Care ManagementPregnancyPregnancy ComplicationsCollaborative carePerinatal depressionText messaging

Identifiers

PMID29494854
PMCPMC5936469
OpenAlexW2788753127

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.