Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29494845›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in microbiology2018

Microfluidics and single-cell microscopy to study stochastic processes in bacteria.

Laurent Potvin-Trottier, Scott Luro, Johan Paulsson

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in microbiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Microbial single-cell applications under anoxic conditions.Applied and environmental microbiology · 2024
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Recent Advances in Bacterial Persistence Mechanisms.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Laurent Potvin-TrottierBiophysics PhD Program, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA; Department of Systems Biology, Harvard Medical School, 200 Longwood Avenue, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Scott LuroDepartment of Systems Biology, Harvard Medical School, 200 Longwood Avenue, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Johan PaulssonDepartment of Systems Biology, Harvard Medical School, 200 Longwood Avenue, Boston, MA 02115, USA. Electronic address: johan_paulsson@hms.harvard.edu.

Funding

Limits and Trade-offs of Feedback ControlR01GM081563 · NIGMS · HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI Johan Paulsson · 2008 to 2026
$4.9M
Stochastic Partitioning and Degradation of MacromoleculesR01GM095784 · NIGMS · HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI PAULSSON, JOHAN · 2011 to 2014
$1.3M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM081563NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM095784
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bacteria have molecules present in low and fluctuating numbers that randomize cell behaviors. Understanding these stochastic processes and their impact on cells has, until recently, been limited by the lack of single-cell measurement methods. Here, we review recent developments in microfluidics that enable following individual cells over long periods of time under precisely controlled conditions, and counting individual fluorescent molecules in many cells. We showcase discoveries that were made possible using these devices in various aspects of microbiology, such as antibiotic tolerance/persistence, cell-size control, cell-fate determination, DNA damage response, and synthetic biology.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsBacteriaDNA DamageEscherichia coliMicrofluidicsMicroscopySingle-Cell AnalysisStochastic ProcessesSynthetic BiologyAnti-Bacterial Agents

Identifiers

PMID29494845
PMCPMC6044433

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.