ArticleGait & posture2018
Healthy individuals are more maneuverable when walking slower while navigating a virtual obstacle course.
Article in Gait & posture, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- How Healthy Older Adults Enact Lateral Maneuvers While Walking.Gait & posture · 2024Article
- The role of the ankle plantar flexor muscles in trip recovery during walking: a computational modeling study.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2023Article
- Rethinking margin of stability: Incorporating step-to-step regulation to resolve the paradox.Journal of biomechanics · 2022Article
- Adaptive multi-objective control explains how humans make lateral maneuvers while walking.PLoS computational biology · 2022Article
- Effects of age, physical and self-perceived balance abilities on lateral stepping adjustments during competing lateral balance tasks.Gait & posture · 2021Article
- Speed impacts frontal-plane maneuver stability of individuals with incomplete spinal cord injury.Clinical biomechanics (Bristol, Avon) · 2020Article
- Humans use multi-objective control to regulate lateral foot placement when walking.PLoS computational biology · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionMaintaining stability, especially in the mediolateral direction, is important for successful walking. Navigating in the community, however, may require people to reduce stability to make quick lateral transitions, creating a tradeoff between stability and maneuverability. Walking slower can improve stability during steady state walking, but there remains a need to better understand how walking speed influences maneuverability. This study investigated how walking at different speeds influenced how individuals modulate both stability and maneuverability in a virtual obstacle course.
methodsFifteen healthy adults walked on a treadmill in a virtual environment for 6 trials each at typical and slower speed. Participants made repeated transitions between virtual sets of arches displayed in any of 4 lanes. Participants were instructed to walk under the arches and hit as few arches as possible. To quantify stability, mean step width and mean lateral margin of stability (Mean MOS) were calculated and averaged for ipsilateral and contralateral steps. To quantify maneuverability, the number of arches hit when entering or exiting each arch set was calculated and averaged for each condition.
resultsParticipants exhibited high levels of variability in their stepping patterns. Mean MOS and mean step width were significantly greater for the typical speed than slower speed for the ipsilateral steps (p < 0.001). Participants hit more arches during the typical speed than during the slow speed (p = 0.039).
conclusionWhen walking at the slower speed, healthy individuals exhibited decreased stability of ipsilateral steps, but increased maneuverability and better transition performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.