ArticleCell systems2018
Assessing Inequality in Transcriptomic Data.
Article in Cell systems, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Patterns of chromosome evolution in ruminants.Molecular ecology · 2024Article
- From Chaos to Opportunity: Decoding Cancer Heterogeneity for Enhanced Treatment Strategies.Biology · 2023Review
- The role and robustness of the Gini coefficient as an unbiased tool for the selection of Gini genes for normalising expression profiling data.Scientific reports · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
- Comment on
- Comment on
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Two studies in this issue of Cell Systems use the Gini index from economics to benchmark and quantify gene expression heterogeneity in single-cell or bulk RNA-seq datasets.
Indexed as
Identifiers
29494801What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.