ArticleJAMA oncology2018
Treatment Trends and Outcomes for Patients With Lymph Node-Positive Cancer of the Penis.
Article in JAMA oncology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 67 citations in OpenAlex.
- Penile cancer: ESMO-EURACAN Clinical Practice Guideline for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up.ESMO open · 2024Guideline
- Article
- Prediction of distant metastases in penile squamous cell carcinoma: a SEER population-based study.International urology and nephrology · 2026Article
- Incarcerated lateral inguinal hernia following ilioinguinal lymph node dissection: an unusual case.Journal of surgical case reports · 2025Article
- Immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy for advanced HPV-related penile squamous cell carcinoma: a rare case report.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio predicts a poor prognosis for penile cancer with an immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Article
- Construction and validation of a prediction model for inguinal lymph node metastasis of penile malignancy.Translational andrology and urology · 2024Article
- Genomic Profiles and Clinical Outcomes of Penile Squamous Cell Carcinoma With Elevated Tumor Mutational Burden.JAMA network open · 2023Article
- Nationwide Data Support Centralised Decision-making in Penile Cancer Care: A Before-and-After Study on Guideline Adherence and Disease-specific survival for Patients with an Indication for Perioperative Oncological Treatment.European urology open science · 2023Article
- Chemotherapy Utilization in Men with Advanced Penile Cancer.Urology practice · 2022Article
- Global research trends in penile cancer: Bibliometric and visualized analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Article
- Contemporary use trends and effect on survival of pelvic lymph node dissection for non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer.Frontiers in surgery · 2022Article
- Underutilization of Surgical Standard of Care for Insured Men with Invasive Penile Cancer.Urology practice · 2021Article
- Expansion of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL) from penile cancer patients.International immunopharmacology · 2021Article
- Penile Cancer: Managing Sexual Dysfunction and Improving Quality of Life After Therapy.Current urology reports · 2021Review
- Molecular stratification by BCL2A1 and AIM2 provides additional prognostic value in penile squamous cell carcinoma.Theranostics · 2021Article
- Multimodal Treatment Combining Salvage Surgery-Assisted Chemotherapy and Checkpoints Blockade Immunotherapy Achieves Complete Remission on a Recurrent Penile Cancer Patient: A Case Report.OncoTargets and therapy · 2021Article
- Association of KRAS mutation with tumor deposit status and overall survival of colorectal cancer.Cancer causes & control : CCC · 2020Article
- Making surgery safer by centralization of care: impact of case load in penile cancer.World journal of urology · 2020Review
- More lymph node dissection improves survival in patients with newly diagnosed lymph node-positive penile cancer.International urology and nephrology · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: Penile cancer is an uncommon disease with minimal level I evidence to guide therapy. The National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines advocate a lymph node dissection (LND) or radiotherapy with consideration of perioperative chemotherapy for all patients with lymph node-positive (LN+) penile cancer without metastasis. Objectives: To determine temporal trends in use of chemotherapy for patients with LN+ penile cancer without metastasis and to evaluate outcomes between those who did or did not receive LND, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy. Design, Setting, and Participants: The US National Cancer Database (NCDB) was queried for all 1123 patients with LN+, squamous cell carcinoma of the penis without metastasis from January 1, 2004, through December 31, 2014. Temporal trends were assessed using Cochran-Armitage tests. Multivariable logistic models were used to examine the association between treatments, clinicopathologic variables, and receipt of chemotherapy. Kaplan-Meier analyses with log-rank tests and multivariable Cox regressions were used to analyze overall survival. Data were analyzed between January 2017 and September 2017. Main Outcomes and Measures: Use of chemotherapy over time. Survival outcomes by receipt or nonreceipt of LND, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy. Results: Of 1123 patients identified, most were white (924 [82.3%]) vs African American (141 [12.6%]) or of other or unknown race (58 [5.2%]). The age of most patients (727 [64.7%]) was between 50 and 75 years, and 750 patients (66.8%) underwent an LND. From 2004 to 2014, the use of systemic therapy significantly increased (26 of 68 patients, 38.2% vs 65 of 136, 47.8%; P < .001). However, only 177 of 335 patients with N3 disease (52.8%) received chemotherapy (N1: 106 of 338, 31.4%; N2: 178 of 450, 39.6%). Following adjustment, older patients (>76 years: OR, 0.28; 95% CI, 0.15-0.50; P < .001) were less likely to receive chemotherapy. Patients who received radiotherapy (OR, 4.38; 95% CI, 3.10-6.18; P < .001) and those patients with N2 (OR, 1.62; 95% CI, 1.16-2.27; P = .005) or N3 (OR, 2.32; 95% CI, 1.67-3.22; P < .001) cancer were more likely to receive chemotherapy. On multivariable analysis, LND (HR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.52-0.78; P < .001) was associated with better overall survival, while neither chemotherapy (HR, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.80-1.26; P = .95) nor radiotherapy (HR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.70-1.04; P = .11) was associated with overall survival. Conclusions and Relevance: In hospitals reporting to the NCDB, only 66.8% of patients with LN+ penile cancer received an LND. While chemotherapy use has increased since 2004, rates remain low (52.8% for patients with N3 cancer). Receipt of LND, but not chemotherapy or radiotherapy, is associated with overall survival. This may reflect the aggressive natural history of penile cancer as well as the inherent analysis limitation of a relatively small sample size. These data highlight opportunities to improve adherence to guideline-recommended care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.