Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29494707›Full record

ArticlePloS one2018

Opposite effect of polyamines on In vitro gene expression: Enhancement at low concentrations but inhibition at high concentrations.

Ai Kanemura, Yuko Yoshikawa, Wakao Fukuda, Kanta Tsumoto, Takahiro Kenmotsu, Kenichi Yoshikawa

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Spatial-Temporal Genome Regulation in Stress-Response and Cell-Fate Change.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Ai KanemuraFaculty of Life and Medical Sciences, Doshisha University, Kyoto, Japan.
Yuko YoshikawaFaculty of Life and Medical Sciences, Doshisha University, Kyoto, Japan.
Wakao FukudaCollege of Life Sciences, Ritsumeikan University, Shiga, Japan.
Kanta TsumotoDepartment of Chemistry for Materials, Faculty of Engineering, Mie University, Mie, Japan.
Takahiro KenmotsuFaculty of Life and Medical Sciences, Doshisha University, Kyoto, Japan.
Kenichi YoshikawaFaculty of Life and Medical Sciences, Doshisha University, Kyoto, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-2751-7136
Doshisha University · JPMie University · JPRitsumeikan University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPolyamines have various biological functions including marked effects on the structure and function of genomic DNA molecules. Changes in the higher-order structure of DNA caused by polyamines are expected to be closely related to genetic activity. To clarify this issue, we examined the relationship between gene expression and the higher-order structure of DNA under different polyamine concentrations. PRINCIPAL

findingsWe studied the effects of polyamines, spermidine SPD(3+) and spermine SP(4+), on gene expression by a luciferase assay. The results showed that gene expression is increased by ca. 5-fold by the addition of SPD(3+) at 0.3 mM, whereas it is completely inhibited above 2 mM. Similarly, with SP(4+), gene expression is maximized at 0.08 mM and completely inhibited above 0.6 mM. We also performed atomic force microscopy (AFM) observations on DNA under different polyamine concentrations. AFM revealed that a flower-like conformation is generated at polyamine concentrations associated with maximum expression as measured by the luciferase assay. On the other hand, DNA molecules exhibit a folded compact conformation at polyamine concentrations associated with the complete inhibition of expression. Based on these results, we discuss the plausible mechanism of the opposite effect, i.e., enhancement and inhibition, of polyamines on gene expression. CONCLUSION AND SIGNIFICANCE: It was found that polyamines exert opposite effect, enhancement and inhibition, on gene expression depending on their concentrations. Such an opposite effect is argued in relation to the conformational change of DNA: enhancement is due to the parallel ordering of DNA segments that is accompanied by a decrease in the negative charge of double-stranded DNA, and inhibition is caused by the compaction of DNA into a tightly packed state with almost perfect charge-neutralization.

Indexed as

Down-RegulationUp-RegulationDNADose-Response Relationship, DrugGene Expression RegulationIn Vitro TechniquesMicroscopy, Atomic ForceModels, MolecularNucleic Acid ConformationPolyaminesSpermidineSpermineDNAPolyaminesSpermidineSpermine

Identifiers

PMID29494707
PMCPMC5832264
OpenAlexW2792965149

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.