ArticlePloS one2018
Dissociable effects of practice variability on learning motor and timing skills.
Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Tapping force variability influences temporal precision in paced finger tapping.Psychological research · 2026Article
- Stability of Neural Oscillations Supports Auditory-Motor Synchronization.The European journal of neuroscience · 2025Article
- Interactive curriculum learning increases and homogenizes motor smoothness.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Effects of individual practice on joint musical synchronization.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2024Article
- The effect of enhanced variability after performance stabilization through constant practice.PeerJ · 2022Article
- The Q-Pass Index: A Multifactorial IMUs-Based Tool to Assess Passing Skills in Basketball.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Human Vestibulo-Ocular Reflex Adaptation Reduces when Training Demand Variability Increases.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2021Article
- Article
- Impact of Visual Biofeedback of Trunk Sway Smoothness on Motor Learning during Unipedal Stance.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
- Physiological and Behavioral Factors in Musicians' Performance Tempo.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2020Article
- Smoothness: an Unexplored Window into Coordinated Running Proficiency.Sports medicine - open · 2019Article
- Audio cues enhance mirroring of arm motion when visual cues are scarce.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Motor skill acquisition inherently depends on the way one practices the motor task. The amount of motor task variability during practice has been shown to foster transfer of the learned skill to other similar motor tasks. In addition, variability in a learning schedule, in which a task and its variations are interweaved during practice, has been shown to help the transfer of learning in motor skill acquisition. However, there is little evidence on how motor task variations and variability schedules during practice act on the acquisition of complex motor skills such as music performance, in which a performer learns both the right movements (motor skill) and the right time to perform them (timing skill). This study investigated the impact of rate (tempo) variability and the schedule of tempo change during practice on timing and motor skill acquisition. Complete novices, with no musical training, practiced a simple musical sequence on a piano keyboard at different rates. Each novice was assigned to one of four learning conditions designed to manipulate the amount of tempo variability across trials (large or small tempo set) and the schedule of tempo change (randomized or non-randomized order) during practice. At test, the novices performed the same musical sequence at a familiar tempo and at novel tempi (testing tempo transfer), as well as two novel (but related) sequences at a familiar tempo (testing spatial transfer). We found that practice conditions had little effect on learning and transfer performance of timing skill. Interestingly, practice conditions influenced motor skill learning (reduction of movement variability): lower temporal variability during practice facilitated transfer to new tempi and new sequences; non-randomized learning schedule improved transfer to new tempi and new sequences. Tempo (rate) and the sequence difficulty (spatial manipulation) affected performance variability in both timing and movement. These findings suggest that there is a dissociable effect of practice variability on learning complex skills that involve both motor and timing constraints.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.