Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29494661›Full record

ArticlePloS one2018

Effects of truck-mounted, ultra low volume mosquito adulticides on honey bees (Apis mellifera) in a suburban field setting.

Vivek Pokhrel, Nicholas A DeLisi, Robert G Danka, Todd W Walker, James A Ottea, Kristen B Healy

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. The Potential ofLife (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Vivek PokhrelDepartment of Entomology, Louisiana State University Agriculture Center, Baton Rouge, LA, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-3208-6537
Nicholas A DeLisiSt. Tammany Parish Mosquito Abatement District, Slidell, LA, United States of America.
Robert G DankaUSDA-ARS Honey Bee Breeding, Genetics, and Physiology Laboratory, Baton Rouge, LA, United States of America.
Todd W WalkerEast Baton Rouge Parish Mosquito Abatement and Rodent Control, Baton Rouge, LA, United States of America.
James A OtteaDepartment of Entomology, Louisiana State University Agriculture Center, Baton Rouge, LA, United States of America.
Kristen B HealyDepartment of Entomology, Louisiana State University Agriculture Center, Baton Rouge, LA, United States of America.
Louisiana State University Agricultural Center · USConsolidated Mosquito Abatement District · USEast Baton Rouge Parish School System · USHoney Bee Breeding, Genetics, and Physiology Laboratory · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Few studies have examined the impact of mosquito adulticides on honey bees under conditions that reflect actual field exposure. Whereas several studies have evaluated the toxicity of mosquito control products on honey bees, most have been laboratory based and have focused solely on acute mortality as a measure of impact. The goal of this study was to determine effects of routine applications of truck-based ultra-low volume (ULV) mosquito adulticides (i.e., Scourge, Duet, and Deltagard) on honey bees in a suburban setting. The mosquito adulticides used in this study were pyrethroids with active ingredients resmethrin (Scourge), prallethrin and sumithrin (Duet), and deltamethrin (Deltagard), in which resmethrin, prallethrin, and sumithrin were synergized with piperonyl butoxide. We measured and compared mortality and detoxification enzyme activities (esterase and glutathione S-transferase) from sentinel beehives within and outside of mosquito control areas. Concurrently, colony health (i.e., number of adult bees, brood quantity and brood quality) was compared throughout the study period. No significant differences were observed in honey bee mortality, colony health or detoxification enzyme activities between treated (five sprayed areas each received one to three insecticide treatment) and control sites (four unsprayed areas that did not receive insecticide treatment) over the seven week study period. However, our laboratory study showed that exposure to resmethrin, the active ingredient in Scourge, caused significant inhibition of esterase activity compared with the control group. Our findings suggest that proper application of truck based insecticides for mosquito control results in little or no exposure and therefore minimal effects on domestic honey bees.

Indexed as

AnimalsBeesEsterasesGene Expression Regulation, EnzymologicGlutathione TransferaseInactivation, MetabolicInsecticidesInsect ProteinsMosquito ControlMotor VehiclesNitrilesPyrethrinsd,d-T80-prallethrindecamethrinEsterasesGlutathione TransferaseInsecticidesInsect ProteinsNitrilesphenothrinPyrethrinsresmethrin

Identifiers

PMID29494661
PMCPMC5832434
OpenAlexW2793142643

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.