Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29494618›Full record

ArticlePloS one2018

Recombination and peak jumping.

Kristina Crona

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 100% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Implications From the Analogous Relationship Between Evolutionary and Learning Processes.BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology · 2025
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kristina CronaAmerican University, Washington DC, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-1819-474X
American University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We show that genetic recombination can be a powerful mechanism for escaping suboptimal peaks. Recent studies of empirical fitness landscapes reveal complex gene interactions and multiple peaks. However, classical work on recombination largely ignores the effect of complex gene interactions. Briefly, we restrict to fitness landscapes where the global peak is difficult to access. If the optimal genotype can be generated by shuffling genes present in the population, then recombination will produce the genotype. If, in addition, recombination is sufficiently rare, then the proportion of the genotype is expected to increase. Specifically, we consider landscapes where shuffling of suboptimal peak genotypes can produce the global peak genotype. The advantage of recombination we identify has no correspondence for 2-locus systems or for smooth landscapes. The effect of recombination indicated is sometimes extreme, also for rare recombination, in the sense that shutting off recombination could result in the organism failing to adapt. A standard question about recombination is whether the mechanism tends to accelerate or decelerate adaptation. However, we argue that extreme effects may be more important than how the majority falls. In a limited sense, our result can be considered a support for Sewall Wright's view that adaptation sometimes works better in subdivided populations.

Indexed as

Computer SimulationEvolution, MolecularModels, GeneticRecombination, GeneticAdaptation, PhysiologicalAnimalsBiological EvolutionGenetics, PopulationGenotypeHumansSelection, Genetic

Identifiers

PMID29494618
PMCPMC5832230
OpenAlexW1543695776

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.