ArticlePloS one2018
Computational de novo discovery of distinguishing genes for biological processes and cell types in complex tissues.
Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- CDState Resolves Malignant Cell Heterogeneity from Bulk Tumor RNA Sequencing Data.Cancer research · 2026Article
- Non-negative matrix factorization and deconvolution as a dual simplex problem.Genome biology · 2026Article
- Robustness and resilience of computational deconvolution methods for bulk RNA sequencing data.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2025Article
- Deconvolution from bulk gene expression by leveraging sample-wise and gene-wise similarities and single-cell RNA-Seq data.BMC genomics · 2024Article
- Fourteen years of cellular deconvolution: methodology, applications, technical evaluation and outstanding challenges.Nucleic acids research · 2024Review
- Characterizing the composition of iPSC derived cells from bulk transcriptomics data with CellMap.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- DeCompress: tissue compartment deconvolution of targeted mRNA expression panels using compressed sensing.Nucleic acids research · 2021Article
- Deciphering cellular transcriptional alterations in Alzheimer's disease brains.Molecular neurodegeneration · 2020Article
- Diverse biological processes coordinate the transcriptional response to nutritional changes in a Drosophila melanogaster multiparent population.BMC genomics · 2020Article
- Multiscale, multimodal analysis of tumor heterogeneity in IDH1 mutant vs wild-type diffuse gliomas.PloS one · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bulk tissue samples examined by gene expression studies are usually heterogeneous. The data gained from these samples display the confounding patterns of mixtures consisting of multiple cell types or similar cell types in various functional states, which hinders the elucidation of the molecular mechanisms underlying complex biological phenomena. A realistic approach to compensate for the limitations of experimentally separating homogenous cell populations from mixed tissues is to computationally identify cell-type specific patterns from bulk, heterogeneous measurements. We designed the CellDistinguisher algorithm to analyze the gene expression data of mixed samples, identifying genes that best distinguish biological processes and cell types. Coupled with a deconvolution algorithm that takes cell type specific gene lists as input, we show that CellDistinguisher performs as well as partial deconvolution algorithms in predicting cell type composition without the need for prior knowledge of cell type signatures. This approach is also better in predicting cell type signatures than the one-step traditional complete deconvolution methods. To illustrate its wide applicability, the algorithm was tested on multiple publicly available data sets. In each case, CellDistinguisher identified genes reflecting biological processes typical for the tissues and development stages of interest and estimated the sample compositions accurately.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.