ArticlePLoS medicine2018
Delays in completion and results reporting of clinical trials under the Paediatric Regulation in the European Union: A cohort study.
Article in PLoS medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
22 citing papers in PubMed.
- Sponsor Initiated Requests to Delay Pediatric Postmarketing Studies.Pharmaceutical medicine · 2026Article
- Neonatology: First Exposure to Antibiotics from the Ethical Perspective of Parents, Physicians, and Regulators.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- "Common sense is hard work" but benefits from persistent collaboration: Lessons learnt from the development of The Collaborative Network for European Clinical Trials for Children (c4c) to support the conduct of paediatric clinical trials of medicines.Contemporary clinical trials communications · 2025Article
- Developing and streamlining clinical trial services to support pediatric drug development across 21 countries in Europe: insights from the conect4children (c4c) network.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Did pediatric drug development advance epilepsy treatment in young patients? It is time for new research goals.World journal of methodology · 2024Review
- Information in summaries of product characteristics about use in children is limited and needs standardisation: a systematic analysis in Switzerland.Archives of disease in childhood · 2024Article
- Availability of results of clinical trials registered on EU Clinical Trials Register: cross sectional audit study.BMJ medicine · 2024Article
- Effects of the Paediatric Regulation funding on the development of off-patent medicines in children.Frontiers in medicine · 2024Article
- Antibiotics needed to treat multidrug-resistant infections in neonates.Bulletin of the World Health Organization · 2022Review
- ADV6209 for Premedication in Pediatric Anesthesia: A Double-Blinded, Randomized Controlled Trial.Pharmaceutics · 2022Article
- Considerations for Selecting Cognitive Endpoints and Psychological Patient-Reported Outcomes for Clinical Trials in Pediatric Patients With Sickle Cell Disease.Frontiers in neurology · 2022Review
- Recommendations on Off-Label Drug Use in Pediatric Guidelines.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2022Article
- Analysis of Paediatric Clinical Trial Characteristics and Activity Over 23 Years-Impact of the European Paediatric Regulation on a Single French Clinical Research Center.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2022Article
- Recommendations by the European Network of Paediatric Research at the European Medicines Agency (Enpr-EMA) Working Group on preparedness of clinical trials about paediatric medicines process.Archives of disease in childhood · 2021Review
- The Term "Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis (JIA)" is Misleading. It Will not be Sufficient to Just Replace this Term.Pharmaceutical medicine · 2021Article
- Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Pharmacologic Treatments for Children: Research Priorities and Approach to Pediatric Studies.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2021Article
- Cardiovascular Paediatric Medicines Development: Have Paediatric Investigation Plans Lost Heart?Pharmaceutics · 2020Article
- Using big data in pediatric oncology: Current applications and future directions.Seminars in oncology · 2020Review
- Noncompletion and nonpublication of trials studying rare diseases: A cross-sectional analysis.PLoS medicine · 2019Article
- Trends in Off-Label Drug Use in Ambulatory Settings: 2006-2015.Pediatrics · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundFew medicines have been approved for children, leading to rates of off-label prescribing reported to be as high as 90%. In 2007, the European Union adopted the Paediatric Regulation, which mandates that pharmaceutical companies conduct paediatric studies for all new medicines, unless granted a waiver. We aimed to evaluate the availability of paediatric trial results from studies required under the Paediatric Regulation for new medicines authorised in the EU. METHODS AND
findingsThe European Medicines Agency (EMA) public database of paediatric investigation plans was searched for new medicines centrally authorised in the EU between 1 January 2010 and 31 December 2014 with at least 1 required paediatric study. For our study cohort of paediatric clinical trials required for these medicines, we used internal EMA databases and publicly available trial registries to determine changes to the planned completion date or study design, rates of trial completion, time to trial completion, and results reporting (peer-reviewed publication or posting on trial registry). Cox proportional hazards regression models were constructed to examine factors associated with study completion. A total of 326 paediatric clinical trials were required for 122 novel medicines authorised by the EMA between 2010 and 2014. In all, 76% (247/326) of paediatric studies were not planned to be completed until after the initial marketing authorisation. The planned completion dates for 50% (162/326) were further postponed by a median of 2.2 years. Overall, 38% (124/326) of paediatric studies were completed as of 30 November 2017. The rate of trial completion for paediatric studies planned to be completed after initial marketing authorisation was 23% (56/247), versus 86% (68/79) for trials planned to be completed before authorisation (adjusted hazard ratio 0.11; 95% CI 0.06-0.19). Among completed studies, the results were reported in a public registry or in the peer-reviewed literature for 85% (105/124) at a median of 1.1 years after study completion, and 60% (74/124) were published in a peer-reviewed journal. Limitations of this study include the potential lack of generalisability to medicines not authorised by the EMA and the possibility for more of these trials to be completed or published in the future.
conclusionsThe completion of many paediatric studies required under the Paediatric Regulation has been delayed. Paediatric studies planned to be completed after marketing authorisation were associated with a lower likelihood of eventual completion, highlighting the need to examine the implementation of current policies in ensuring timely availability of important paediatric information.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.