Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29494275›Full record

ArticleHuman vaccines & immunotherapeutics2018

The gut microbiota and immune checkpoint inhibitors.

Audrey Humphries, Adil Daud

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Gut Microbiota and Extraintestinal Cancers: Mechanistic Insights and Microbiome-Targeted Interventions.JGH open : an open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology · 2026
    Review
  3. Impact of opioid analgesics on survival in cancer patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024
    Observational
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Gut Microbial Signatures in Sporadic and Hereditary Colorectal Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Mechanisms of checkpoint inhibition-induced adverse events.Clinical and experimental immunology · 2020
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Human microbial ecology and the rising new medicine.Annals of translational medicine · 2019
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Audrey Humphriesa Department of Medicine , Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of California San Francisco , San Francisco , CA , USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0605-8460
Adil Dauda Department of Medicine , Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of California San Francisco , San Francisco , CA , USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although immunotherapy has been remarkably effective across multiple cancer types, there continues to be a significant number of non-responding patients. A possible factor proposed to influence the efficacy of immunotherapies is the gut microbiome. We discuss the results and implications of recent research on the relationship between the gut microbiome, our immune systems, and immune checkpoint inhibitor therapies including anti-CTLA-4 Ab and anti-PD-1 Ab. While the investigations all exhibit interesting results and conclusions, we find little congruence in the specific bacteria that were found favorable for antitumor responses. It is unclear whether the inconsistencies are due to differential approaches in study design (pre-clinical or clinical subjects, anti-CTLA-4 Ab or anti-PD-1 Ab), experimental methods and measurements (metagenomics sequencing and clustering variations) or subject population dynamics (differential cancer types and baseline characteristics). Moreover, we note studies regarding particular bacterial commensals and autoimmune diseases, which challenge findings from these investigations. We conclude that with the current research, clinical investigators can appreciate the critical role of gut microbiota in mediating immunostimulant response. However, prospective research exploring the biochemical mechanisms which commensal bacteria communicate with each other and the immune system is imperative to understand how they can be adjusted properly for higher immunotherapy response.

Indexed as

AnimalsCancer VaccinesCTLA-4 AntigenGastrointestinal MicrobiomeHumansImmunotherapyProgrammed Cell Death 1 ReceptorCancer VaccinesCTLA-4 AntigenProgrammed Cell Death 1 Receptorcancergutimmunotherapymelanomamicrobiomeoncology

Identifiers

PMID29494275
PMCPMC6183319

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.