Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29494168›Full record

ArticleBehavioral neuroscience2018

Inter- and intra-mouse variability in odor preferences revealed in an olfactory multiple-choice test.

Sonum Jagetia, Adrianna J Milton, Lucas A Stetzik, Samantha Liu, Kavya Pai, Keiko Arakawa, Nathalie Mandairon, Daniel W Wesson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavioral neuroscience, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Sonum JagetiaHathaway Brown School.
Adrianna J MiltonDepartment of Neurosciences, Case Western Reserve University.
Lucas A StetzikDepartment of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, University of Florida.
Samantha LiuDepartment of Neurosciences, Case Western Reserve University.
Kavya PaiDepartment of Neurosciences, Case Western Reserve University.
Keiko ArakawaDepartment of Neurosciences, Case Western Reserve University.
Nathalie MandaironLyon Neuroscience Research Center, Neuroplasticity and Neuropathology of Olfactory Perception Team, University of Lyon.
Daniel W WessonDepartment of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, University of Florida.

Funding

Linking Synucleinopathy and Dysfunction of Olfactory PathwaysR01DC016519 · NIDCD · VAN ANDEL RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI MOORE, DARREN JOHN, WESSON, DANIEL W · 2017 to 2021
$2.8M
INTER-REGIONAL CODING OF ODOR VALENCE BY NEURAL ENSEMBLESR01DC014443 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI WESSON, DANIEL W · 2015 to 2019
$2.3M
Case Western Reserve UniversityCentre national de la recherche scientifiqueLyon 1 UniversityNational Institutes of Health; National Instutute on Deafness and Other Communication DisordersNIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC014443NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC016519
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Animals choose between sensory stimuli, a highly complex behavior which includes detection, discrimination, preference, and memory processes. Rodents are reported to display robust preferences for some odors, for instance, in the context of choosing among possible mates or food items. In contrast to the apparent robustness of responses toward these and other "ethologically relevant" odors, little is known about the robustness of behaviors toward odors which have no overt role in the rodent ecological niche, so-called "nonethologically relevant" odors. We developed an apparatus for monitoring the nose-poking behavior of mice and used this apparatus to explore the prevalence and stability of choices among different odors both across mice, and within mice over successive days. Mice were tested with a panel of either ethologically relevant or nonethologically relevant odors in an olfactory multiple-choice test. Significant preferences to nonethologically relevant odors were observed across the population of mice, with longer investigation durations to some odors more than to others. However, we found substantial inter-mouse variability in these responses, and that responses to these odors even varied within mice across days of testing. Tests with ethologically relevant odors revealed that responses toward these odors were also variable across mice, but within individual mice, responses were somewhat stable. This work establishes an olfactory multiple-choice test for monitoring odor investigation, choice, and preference behaviors and the application of this apparatus to assess across- and within-mouse odor-preference choice stability. These results highlight that odor preferences, as assayed by measuring choice behaviors, are variable. (PsycINFO Database Record

Indexed as

Behavior, AnimalChoice BehaviorOlfactory PerceptionAnimalsBehavior Rating ScaleIndividualityMaleMice, Inbred C57BLMotor ActivityNoseOdorantsSmellTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID29494168
PMCPMC6530477

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.