Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29493902›Full record

ArticleMaternal & child nutrition2018

Integrating nutrition into health systems at community level: Impact evaluation of the community-based maternal and neonatal health and nutrition projects in Ethiopia, Kenya, and Senegal.

Jacqueline K Kung'u, Richard Pendame, Mame Bineta Ndiaye, Mulusew Gerbaba, Sophie Ochola, Adama Faye, Sulochana Basnet, Edward A Frongillo, Sara Wuehler, Luz Maria De-Regil

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Maternal & child nutrition, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Jacqueline K Kung'uAfrica Regional Office, Nutrition International, Nairobi, Kenya.ORCID 0000-0003-2535-7041
Richard PendameAfrica Regional Office, Nutrition International, Nairobi, Kenya.
Mame Bineta NdiayeSahel Office, Nutrition International, Dakar, Senegal.
Mulusew GerbabaPopulation and Family Health, Jimma University, Jimma, Ethiopia.
Sophie OcholaFoods, Nutrition and Dietetics, Kenyatta University, Nairobi, Kenya.
Adama FayeInstitut de Santé et Développement, Université Cheikh Anta Diop de Dakar, Dakar, Senegal.
Sulochana BasnetUniversity of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina, USA.
Edward A FrongilloUniversity of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina, USA.
Sara WuehlerNutrition International, Ottawa, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-1972-0150
Luz Maria De-RegilNutrition International, Ottawa, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Maternal undernutrition and mortality remain high in several African countries. Key nutrition and health interventions improve maternal and birth outcomes. Evidence is scarce on how to strengthen health systems to ensure pregnant women and newborns are reached with these interventions. We conducted three quasi-experimental nonrandomized Community Based Maternal and Neonatal Health and Nutrition projects in regions of Ethiopia, Senegal, and Kenya to demonstrate how proven nutrition interventions could be integrated into health programs to improve knowledge and practices during pregnancy, birth, and postpartum. We evaluated impact on knowledge and practices related to maternal and neonatal care using logistic regression and repeated-measures models with districts as a fixed variable and adjusted for covariates. Combined country analyses show significant positive effects of the intervention on women receiving first antenatal care visit (ANC) during first trimester (OR = 1.44; p < .001), those consuming any iron and folic acid supplement during their latest pregnancy (OR = 1.60; p = .005), those whose <6 months infants were exclusively breastfed (OR = 2.01; p=.003), those whose delivery was facility based (OR = 1.48; p=.031), and those whose postnatal care was facility based (OR = 2.15; p<.001). There was no significant differences between intervention and control groups regarding one or more and four or more ANC visits, women consuming iron and folic acid for ≥90 days, and early initiation of breastfeeding. We conclude that integrating proven nutrition interventions into health programs at community level improved components of access to and use of ANC, delivery services, and postnatal care by women in three African countries.

Indexed as

AdultBreast FeedingCommunity Health PlanningDelivery, ObstetricDietary SupplementsEthiopiaFemaleFolic AcidHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHealth PromotionHumansInfantInfant, NewbornIron, DietaryKenyaNutritional StatusFolic AcidIron, Dietaryantenatal caredeliveryimpact evaluationiron folic acidnutritionpostnatal care

Identifiers

PMID29493902
PMCPMC6865938

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.