Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29493262›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of radiology2018

Clinical and histological features of second breast cancers following radiotherapy for childhood and young adult malignancy.

Charlotte Demoor-Goldschmidt, Stéphane Supiot, Marc-André Mahé, Odile Oberlin, Rodrigue Allodji, Nadia Haddy, Sylvie Helfre, Céline Vigneron, Victoire Brillaud-Meflah, Valérie Bernier and 5 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of radiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Characteristics and Outcomes for Secondary Breast Cancer in Childhood, Adolescent, and Young Adult Cancer Survivors Treated with Radiation.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2020
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Charlotte Demoor-Goldschmidt1 CESP University. Paris-Sud, UVSQ, INSERM, Université Paris-Saclay , Villejuif , France.
Stéphane Supiot3 Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest , Saint-Herblain , France.
Marc-André Mahé3 Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest , Saint-Herblain , France.
Odile Oberlin4 Department of Pediatric Oncology, Institut Gustave Roussy , Villejuif , France.
Rodrigue Allodji1 CESP University. Paris-Sud, UVSQ, INSERM, Université Paris-Saclay , Villejuif , France.
Nadia Haddy1 CESP University. Paris-Sud, UVSQ, INSERM, Université Paris-Saclay , Villejuif , France.
Sylvie Helfre5 Department of Radiotherapy, Institut Curie , Paris , France.
Céline Vigneron6 Department of Radiotherapy, Centre Paul Strauss , Strasbourg , France.
Victoire Brillaud-Meflah7 Department of Gynecology, Institut Bergonié , Bordeaux , France.
Valérie Bernier8 Department of Radiotherapy, Centre Alexis Vautrin , Nancy , France.
Anne Laprie
Anne Ducassou
Line Claude
Ibrahim Diallo1 CESP University. Paris-Sud, UVSQ, INSERM, Université Paris-Saclay , Villejuif , France.
Florent de Vathaire1 CESP University. Paris-Sud, UVSQ, INSERM, Université Paris-Saclay , Villejuif , France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe purpose of this study was to determine the characteristics of early second breast cancer (SBC) among survivors of childhood and young adult malignancy treated with irradiation.

methodsWe conducted a multicenter retrospective study of women who presented with breast cancer aged 50 years or younger in nine French centers.

results121 patients and 141 SBC were analyzed (invasive = 130; non-invasive = 11). The mean age at first cancer diagnosis was 15 years and at initial SBC diagnosis was 38 years. Bilateral disease before the age of 51 years was diagnosed in 16% of the females. The majority of SBC were invasive carcinomas (92%). Among the invasive carcinomas, 39% had a histoprognostic score of III, 3.1% overexpressed HER2 and 29% were triple negative. The proportion of triple negative phenotype SBC was higher in patients older at first cancer diagnosis [RR = 1.2, 95% CI (1.1-1.3)]. 94% of triple negative SBCs developed in breast tissue which had received >20 Gy.

conclusionWe found a high proportion of aggressive SBC following thoracic radiotherapy in childhood or early adulthood. Advances in knowledge: SBC screening is recommended by scientific societies for these child/young-adulthood cancer survivors in the same way as the one for high risk women because of constitutional mutations. Our results support these recommendations, not only because of a similar cumulative risk, but also because of the aggressive histological characteristics.

Indexed as

Cancer SurvivorsAdolescentAdultBreast NeoplasmsChildChild, PreschoolFemaleGene ExpressionGenes, erbB-2HumansInfantMiddle AgedNeoplasms, Second PrimaryRadiography, ThoracicRadiotherapy DosageRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID29493262
PMCPMC6223287

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.