ArticleJournal of applied clinical medical physics2018
Setup errors in radiation therapy for thoracic tumor patients of different body mass index.
Article in Journal of applied clinical medical physics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Margins of Planning Target Volume and Set-up Errors based on Megavoltage Cone-Beam CT Image Guided Radiotherapy with Helical Tomotherapy: Importance of Automatic Registration Plus Manual Registration.Journal of biomedical physics & engineering · 2026Article
- Does deformation of immobilization devices impact treatment accuracy in thoracic cancer radiotherapy?Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2025Article
- Impact of belly board immobilization devices and body mass factor on setup displacement using daily cone-beam CT in rectal cancer radiotherapy.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2025Article
- Impact of immobilization system angle, body mass index and breast size on breast radiotherapy accuracy using EPID-only setup.Heliyon · 2025Article
- Article
- Factors influencing downstaging after neoadjuvant long-course chemoradiotherapy in rectal carcinoma.International journal of colorectal disease · 2022Article
- Impact of Cold Weather on Setup Errors in Radiotherapy.Journal of healthcare engineering · 2021Article
- Influence of Clinical and Tumor Factors on Interfraction Setup Errors With Rotation Correction for Vacuum Cushion in Lung Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy.Frontiers in oncology · 2021Article
- Effects of the recurrence pattern on patient survival following SABR for stage I lung cancer.Acta oncologica (Stockholm, Sweden) · 2020Article
- Setup Accuracy in Craniospinal Irradiation: Implications for Planning Treatment Volume Margins.Advances in radiation oncologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo assess the setup errors in radiation therapy for thoracic tumors patients of different somatotypes, and to seek an individualized mathematical basis for defining the planning target volume (PTV).
methodsSixty patients with thoracic tumors were divided into four somatotypes according to their body mass index (BMI), and their body positions were setup by two groups of technicians independently. CT simulations were performed and the reconstructed radiography was digitally generated as reference images for location verification and error measurement. By setting positioning error ranges, the within-range positioning correction rate was compared among groups.
resultsPosition setups for patients in the emaciated group, moderate group, and overweight group were relatively stable (with minor setup error differences between the two groups of technicians). In emaciated group, moderate group, overweight group, and obese group, setup errors in the right-left direction (R-L) were 2.2 ± 1.3 mm, 2.2 ± 1.6 mm, 3.9 ± 3.1 mm, and 8.8 ± 3.5 mm, respectively; whereas the setup errors in the four groups in the superior-inferior(S-I) direction were 2.4 ± 1.8 mm, 2.1 ± 1.9 mm, 3.2 ± 2.6 mm, and 5.4 ± 3.5 mm, and in the anterior-posterior (A-P) direction were 2.2 ± 1.7 mm, 1.9 ± 1.9 mm, 3.2 ± 2.9 mm, and 6.2 ± 4.2 mm, respectively. Moreover, in the moderate group, the positioning correction rate in the three directions (R-L, S-I, and A-P) was 20%, 9%, 8% within the error range of 5-10 mm, and 3%, 0%, 1% with a more than 10 mm error range. However, in overweight group and obese group, the positioning correction rate in these three directions (also with a more than 10 mm error range) was 23%, 27%, 19% and 21%, 16%, 23%, respectively.
conclusionsIn radiation therapy for patients with thoracic tumors, the definition of PTV should be individualized. Meanwhile, with the increase in BMI, positioning correction rate has a tendency to rise too.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.