Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29492965›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of cancer2018

A clinicopathological study and prognostic factor analysis of 177 salivary duct carcinoma patients from The Netherlands.

Eline Boon, Miranda Bel, Wim van Boxtel, Winette T A van der Graaf, Robert J J van Es, Simone E J Eerenstein, Robert J Baatenburg de Jong, Michiel W M van den Brekel, Lilly-Ann van der Velden, Max J H Witjes and 9 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of cancer, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 64 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
64citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
11.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

64 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 117 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Phase II Study of Enzalutamide for Patients With Androgen Receptor-Positive Salivary Gland Cancers (Alliance A091404).Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2022
    Trial
  4. Theranostics · 2020
    Trial
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Bayesian federated inference for survival models.Journal of applied statistics · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

4 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 9 institutions in 2 countries.

Eline BoonDepartment of Medical Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-9768-2911
Miranda BelDepartment of Medical Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Wim van BoxtelDepartment of Medical Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Winette T A van der GraafDepartment of Medical Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Robert J J van EsDepartment of Head and Neck Surgical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Simone E J EerensteinDepartment of Otolaryngology/Head, Neck Surgery VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Robert J Baatenburg de JongDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology/Head and Neck surgery Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Michiel W M van den BrekelDepartment of Head and Neck Oncology and Surgery, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek/Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Lilly-Ann van der VeldenDepartment of Head and Neck Oncology and Surgery, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek/Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Max J H WitjesDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Ann HoebenDepartment of Medical Oncology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Stefan M WillemsDepartment of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Elisabeth BloemenaDepartment of Pathology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Laura A SmitDepartment of Pathology, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek/Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Sjoukje F OostingDepartment of Medical Oncology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
PALGA Group
Marianne A JonkerDepartment for Health evidence, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Uta E FluckeDepartment of Pathology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Carla M L van HerpenDepartment of Medical Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Radboud University Nijmegen · NLAmsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam · NLThe Netherlands Cancer Institute · NLUniversity Medical Center Groningen · NLUniversity Medical Center Utrecht · NLErasmus MC · NLLeiden University Medical Center · NLMaastricht University · NLRoyal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Salivary duct carcinoma (SDC) is a subtype of salivary gland cancer with a dismal prognosis and a need for better prognostication and novel treatments. The aim of this national cohort study was to investigate clinical outcome, prognostic factors, androgen receptor (AR) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) expression. SDC patients diagnosed between 1990 and 2014 were identified by the Nationwide Network and Registry of Histo- and Cytopathology in the Netherlands (PALGA). Subsequently, medical records were evaluated and pathological diagnoses reviewed. Data were analyzed for overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) and prognostic factors. AR was evaluated by immunohistochemistry (IHC), HER2 by IHC and fluorescent in-situ hybridization. A total of 177 patients were included. The median age was 65 years, 75% were male. At diagnosis, 68% presented with lymph node metastases and 6% with distant metastases. Median OS, DFS and DMFS were 51, 23 and 26 months, respectively. In patients presenting without distant metastases, the absolute number of positive lymph nodes was associated with poor OS and DMFS in a multivariable analysis. AR and HER2 were positive in 161/168 (96%) and 44/153 (29%) tumors, respectively, and were not prognostic factors. SDC has a dismal prognosis with primary lymph node involvement in the majority of patients. The absolute number of lymph node metastases was found to be the only prognostic factor for DMFS and OS. AR expression and-to a lesser extent-HER2 expression hold promise for systemic treatment in the metastatic and eventually adjuvant setting.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overCarcinomaChemoradiotherapy, AdjuvantDisease-Free SurvivalErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesFactor Analysis, StatisticalFemaleHumansLymphatic MetastasisMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm MetastasisNetherlandsPalliative CareAR protein, humanERBB2 protein, humanErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesReceptors, Androgenandrogen receptorsErbB-2fluorescenceimmunohistochemistryin situ hybridizationprognosisreceptorsalivary duct carcinomasalivary gland neoplasmssurvival

Identifiers

PMID29492965
PMCPMC6055864
OpenAlexW2791073967

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.