ArticleMolecular and cellular biochemistry2018
Olfactory-ensheathing cells promote physiological repair of injured recurrent laryngeal nerves and functional recovery of glottises in dogs.
Article in Molecular and cellular biochemistry, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Reconstruction of the Damaged Dorsal Root Entry Zone by Transplantation of Olfactory Ensheathing Cells.Cell transplantationArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The aim of this study was to investigate whether the transplantation of olfactory-ensheathing cells (OECs) could physiologically repair severely injured recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN) in dogs. Adult Beagle dogs were surgically introduced with a 10-mm defect in the left RLN and transplanted with a nerve guide (NEUROLAC) containing dog olfactory mucosa-olfactory-ensheathing cells (OM-OECs) in matrigel. The effects of OM-OECs on the morphology, histology, and electrophysiology of the injured RLNs, glottis movement, and voice acoustics were comparatively studied. Two months after transplantation, the normal dogs (group N) had intact left RLNs that contained axons well organized as bundles, transmitted action potentials of high amplitudes without latent phases, and modulated glottis movement to produce normal voices. The RLN-damaged dogs transplanted with OM-OECs (group CTT) had pieces of nerves regenerated in the place of the defects, which contained fewer axons scattered in the internal nerve membrane and wrapped peripherally by the connective tissue, prevented the distal trunk of the defected RLN from shrinking, transmitted action potentials of lower amplitudes with latent phases, and modulated a slightly impaired glottis movement to produce voices with slight differences compared to the N dogs. The RLN-damaged dogs without OM-OECs (group NC) had no nerves generated at the defective or the damaged area, leading to a shrinkage in the enervated distal nerve trunks; a blockage in nerve pulse transit; a paralysis of the left vocal cords; an impaired glottis movement; and abnormal voices. Transplantation of OM-OECs promoted nerve regeneration, and the recoveries of glottises and voices in dogs with RLN injury.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.