Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29492782›Full record

ArticleEJNMMI research2018

Biokinetic and dosimetric aspects of

Sergio Righi, Martina Ugolini, Gianluca Bottoni, Matteo Puntoni, Massimiliano Iacozzi, Francesco Paparo, Manlio Cabria, Luca Ceriani, Monica Gambaro, Luca Giovanella and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EJNMMI research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Preclinical Theranostic Profiling of [Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Diagnostic and Dosimetry Features of [Molecular imaging and biology · 2023
    Article
  5. An Overview of In Vitro Assays ofDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  6. Editorial:Frontiers in medicine · 2023
    Article
  7. Cellular lethal damage ofFrontiers in medicine · 2023
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Recent Advances in Cancer Imaging withNuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2022
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Nanomedicine : nanotechnology, biology, and medicine · 2020
    Article
  14. Preclinical PET imaging study of lung cancer withAnnals of nuclear medicine · 2020
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Radiobiological Characterization ofMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2018
    Article
  19. Insights into Trace Metal Metabolism in Health and Disease from PET: "PET Metallomics".Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2018
    Review
  20. Copper-64: a real theranostic agent.Drug design, development and therapy · 2018
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Sergio RighiMedical Physics Department, E.O. Galliera Hospital, Genoa, Italy.
Martina UgoliniMedical Physics Department, E.O. Galliera Hospital, Genoa, Italy.
Gianluca BottoniDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Galliera Hospital, Mura delle Cappuccine 14, 16128, Genoa, Italy.
Matteo PuntoniClinical Trial Unit, Office of the Scientific Director, Galliera Hospital, Genoa, Italy.
Massimiliano IacozziDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Galliera Hospital, Mura delle Cappuccine 14, 16128, Genoa, Italy.
Francesco PaparoDepartment of Radiology, E.O. Galliera Hospital, Genoa, Italy.
Manlio CabriaDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Galliera Hospital, Mura delle Cappuccine 14, 16128, Genoa, Italy.
Luca CerianiDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland, Bellinzona, Switzerland.
Monica GambaroMedical Physics Department, E.O. Galliera Hospital, Genoa, Italy.
Luca GiovanellaDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland, Bellinzona, Switzerland.
Arnoldo PiccardoDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Galliera Hospital, Mura delle Cappuccine 14, 16128, Genoa, Italy. arnoldo.piccardo@galliera.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6779-1471

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe aim of the present study is to evaluate the kinetics and dosimetry of

resultsThe mean effective half-life of

conclusionsDosimetry showed that the dose absorbed by PCa recurrences/metastases per administrated activity was low. The dosimetric study performed does not take into account the possible therapeutic effect of the Auger electrons. Clinical trials are needed to evaluate

Indexed as

64CuCl2ElderlyKinetics and dosimetryProstate cancerTheranostic

Identifiers

PMID29492782
PMCPMC5833894

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.