ArticleThe international journal of cardiovascular imaging2018
Healing score of the Xinsorb scaffold in the treatment of de novo lesions: 6-month imaging outcomes.
Article in The international journal of cardiovascular imaging, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cardiovascular stent technologies for coronary and valvular heart disease: the potential of 3D printing for stent fabrication.Nature reviews. Cardiology · 2026Review
- Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine: Achievements, Future, and Sustainability in Asia.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2020Review
- Bioresorbable Scaffolds: Contemporary Status and Future Directions.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2020Review
- Cardiovascular imaging 2018 in the International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The objectives of this study are to assess the healing score (HS) and neointimal thickness of the Xinsorb scaffold, and explore the relationships between the implanted patterns, neointimal thickness, and HS. The Xinsorb bioresorbable sirolimus-eluting scaffold is the first domestically designed and fabricated bioresorbable scaffold in China. The 6-month follow-up found it to be safe and effective in the treatment of single de novo coronary lesions. The Xinsorb scaffolds were implanted in 30 patients with symptomatic ischemic coronary disease. A 6-month follow-up was performed in a subset of 19 patients; the HS and neointimal thickness were evaluated by optical coherence tomography. Struts were classified as ApposedCovered, ApposedUncovered, MalapposedCovered, MalapposedUncovered, jailing and presence of intraluminal masses. The implanted pressure, implanted duration, and post-expansion pressure were recorded during the operation. We evaluated the relationship between the HS or neointimal thickness and the implanted pressure, holding time, and post-expansion pressure. The device and procedure success rates were both 100%. No major adverse cardiac or scaffold-thrombus related events occurred. At 6 months, 12,295 struts were analyzed to determine the HS (6.23) and neointimal thickness (0.1021 ± 0.05718 mm) in the Xinsorb scaffolds. There was a strong negative relationship between the HS and the implantation duration (Pearson r = - 0.518, p = 0.023). A significant negative relationship also existed between the HS and post-dilatation (Pearson r = - 0.631, p = 0.004). The Xinsorb scaffold HS appears negative correlated with the implanted duration and post-dilatation. We will further evaluate the HS of randomized controlled trial of the Xissorb scaffold.
Indexed as
Identifiers
29492775What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.