Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29492726›Full record

ArticleJournal of cheminformatics2018

Efficient iterative virtual screening with Apache Spark and conformal prediction.

Laeeq Ahmed, Valentin Georgiev, Marco Capuccini, Salman Toor, Wesley Schaal, Erwin Laure, Ola Spjuth

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cheminformatics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Laeeq AhmedDepartment of Computational Science and Technology, Royal Institute of Technology (KTH), Lindstedtsvägen 5, 10044, Stockholm, Sweden. laeeq@kth.se.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6877-3702
Valentin GeorgievDepartment of Pharmaceutical Biosciences, Uppsala University, Box 591, 75124, Uppsala, Sweden.
Marco CapucciniDepartment of Pharmaceutical Biosciences, Uppsala University, Box 591, 75124, Uppsala, Sweden.
Salman ToorDepartment of Information Technology, Uppsala University, Box 337, 75105, Uppsala, Sweden.
Wesley SchaalDepartment of Pharmaceutical Biosciences, Uppsala University, Box 591, 75124, Uppsala, Sweden.
Erwin LaureDepartment of Computational Science and Technology, Royal Institute of Technology (KTH), Lindstedtsvägen 5, 10044, Stockholm, Sweden.
Ola SpjuthDepartment of Pharmaceutical Biosciences, Uppsala University, Box 591, 75124, Uppsala, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDocking and scoring large libraries of ligands against target proteins forms the basis of structure-based virtual screening. The problem is trivially parallelizable, and calculations are generally carried out on computer clusters or on large workstations in a brute force manner, by docking and scoring all available ligands. CONTRIBUTION: In this study we propose a strategy that is based on iteratively docking a set of ligands to form a training set, training a ligand-based model on this set, and predicting the remainder of the ligands to exclude those predicted as 'low-scoring' ligands. Then, another set of ligands are docked, the model is retrained and the process is repeated until a certain model efficiency level is reached. Thereafter, the remaining ligands are docked or excluded based on this model. We use SVM and conformal prediction to deliver valid prediction intervals for ranking the predicted ligands, and Apache Spark to parallelize both the docking and the modeling.

resultsWe show on 4 different targets that conformal prediction based virtual screening (CPVS) is able to reduce the number of docked molecules by 62.61% while retaining an accuracy for the top 30 hits of 94% on average and a speedup of 3.7. The implementation is available as open source via GitHub ( https://github.com/laeeq80/spark-cpvs ) and can be run on high-performance computers as well as on cloud resources.

Indexed as

Apache SparkCloud computingConformal predictionDockingVirtual screening

Identifiers

PMID29492726
PMCPMC5833896

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.