ReviewDer Radiologe2018
[Foot and ankle tumours : Part II: Malignant bone tumours and soft tissue tumours of the foot with differential diagnostic hints].
Review in Der Radiologe, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Distribution Patterns of Tumors and Tumor-Like Lesions of the Forefoot and Midfoot: A 12.5-Year Study at a University Hospital.Foot & ankle specialist · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
clinical issueBoth benign and malignant tumours are encountered in the foot and ankle. Due to their rarity, however, diagnosis is often uncertain. Usual criteria such as tumour size, invasiveness or pain fail to differentiate benign from malignant neoplasias. STANDARD RADIOLOGICAL
methodsPlain radiography and-due to the complex foot anatomy-CT are important in the diagnostic evaluation of primary bone tumours. In the case of soft tissue tumours, ultrasonography is used to identify ganglion cysts. Tumour evaluation and staging are then performed using MRI. Nuclear imaging comes into play when multifocal, metastatic or systemic spread of the disease is suspected or if a biopsy procedure is planned. METHODICAL INNOVATIONS: For the role of dual-energy CT, please refer to part I. Whether dual-energy CT is suitable to assess bone marrow oedema patterns is still debated. SPECIAL FEATURES OF FOOT AND ANKLE TUMOURS: Primary bone tumours generally present in the ankle or the hindfoot. Malignant bone tumours, e. g. chondrosarcoma, are primarily found in the latter. On the other hand, soft tissue tumours generally present in the mid- and forefoot regions. ACHIEVEMENTS: While the radiologic diagnostic evaluation of pedal bone tumours is quite reliable, caution is urgently needed in the case of soft tissue tumours because there are many confusing differential diagnoses. PRACTICAL RECOMMENDATIONS: Proper X‑ray examination of the foot (at least in two plains) or with special views according to bony pathology is needed. All soft tissue masses that are not cysts should be evaluated further. MRI remains the diagnostic modality of choice but never stands alone! Caution: Size and well-defined margins of pedal soft tissue tumours are not considered criteria regarding whether a tumour is malignant or not.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.