Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29492390›Full record

ArticleAnnals of cardiothoracic surgery2018

Donor selection in the modern era.

Kiran K Khush

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of cardiothoracic surgery, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
8.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 64 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Donor heart selection: Evidence-based guidelines for providers.The Journal of heart and lung transplantation : the official publication of the International Society for Heart Transplantation · 2023
    Guideline
  2. Prognostic implications of one-year left ventricular systolic function after heart transplantation.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. A comparative analysis of echocardiographic data for heart transplant eligibility in brain death cases.The Egyptian heart journal : (EHJ) : official bulletin of the Egyptian Society of Cardiology · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Reasons for donor heart offer refusal in the United States: Results from 14,132 transplant clinician surveys in the Donor Heart Study.The Journal of heart and lung transplantation : the official publication of the International Society for Heart Transplantation · 2025
    Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Heart Transplantation in High-Risk Recipients Employing Donor Marginal Grafts Preserved WithTransplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation · 2023
    Article
  13. A Holistic View of Advanced Heart Failure.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kiran K KhushDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA.
Stanford University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The growing disparity between the supply of donor hearts for transplantation and the demand for such organs has led to liberalization of the criteria for donor heart acceptance over the past few decades. The upper age limit and size restrictions for donor heart acceptance continue to be revised and hearts are being routinely used from donors with left ventricular dysfunction, left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH), cocaine use, multiple medical co-morbidities and after cardiopulmonary resuscitation. This article reviews recent data for use of such "expanded criteria" donor hearts and suggests ways to further increase the donor pool, including use of hearts from donors with hepatitis C and after circulatory determination of death. Donor biomarkers and risk scores may eventually aid in heart acceptance decisions, while ethical issues surrounding information sharing with transplant recipients remain a topic of great debate.

Indexed as

biomarkersdonorHeart transplantrisk scoresselection

Identifiers

PMID29492390
PMCPMC5827134
OpenAlexW2779956587

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.