Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29492338›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2018

Genome-Enhanced Detection and Identification (GEDI) of plant pathogens.

Nicolas Feau, Stéphanie Beauseigle, Marie-Josée Bergeron, Guillaume J Bilodeau, Inanc Birol, Sandra Cervantes-Arango, Braham Dhillon, Angela L Dale, Padmini Herath, Steven J M Jones and 9 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
6.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Genome sequences of three genetic lineages of the fungusMicrobiology resource announcements · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 11 institutions in 3 countries.

Nicolas FeauDepartment of Forest and Conservation Sciences, Forest Sciences Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Stéphanie BeauseigleBiopterre, Sainte-Anne-de-la-Pocatière, Quebec, Canada.
Marie-Josée BergeronCanadian Forest Service, Natural Resources Canada, Quebec city, Quebec, Canada.
Guillaume J BilodeauOttawa Plant Laboratory, Canadian Food Inspection Agency, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Inanc BirolBC Cancer agency, Genome Sciences Centre, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Sandra Cervantes-ArangoDepartment of Forest and Conservation Sciences, Forest Sciences Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Braham DhillonDepartment of Plant Pathology, University of Arkansas at Fayetteville, Fayetteville, AR, United States of America.
Angela L DaleDepartment of Forest and Conservation Sciences, Forest Sciences Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Padmini HerathDepartment of Forest and Conservation Sciences, Forest Sciences Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Steven J M JonesBC Cancer agency, Genome Sciences Centre, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Josyanne LamarcheCanadian Forest Service, Natural Resources Canada, Quebec city, Quebec, Canada.
Dario I OjedaDepartment of Biology Unit of Ecology and Genetics, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland.
Monique L SakalidisDepartment of Plant, Soil & Microbial Sciences and Department of Forestry, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, United States of America.
Greg TaylorBC Cancer agency, Genome Sciences Centre, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Clement K M TsuiFaculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Adnan UzunovicFPInnovations, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Hesther YuehDepartment of Forest and Conservation Sciences, Forest Sciences Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Philippe TanguayCanadian Forest Service, Natural Resources Canada, Quebec city, Quebec, Canada.
Richard C HamelinDepartment of Forest and Conservation Sciences, Forest Sciences Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
University of British Columbia · CACanadian Forest Service · CABC Cancer Agency · CAFPInnovations · CABiopterre · CACanadian Food Inspection Agency · CAMichigan State University · USSimon Fraser University · CAUniversité Laval · CAUniversity of Arkansas at Fayetteville · USUniversity of Oulu · FI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Plant diseases caused by fungi and Oomycetes represent worldwide threats to crops and forest ecosystems. Effective prevention and appropriate management of emerging diseases rely on rapid detection and identification of the causal pathogens. The increase in genomic resources makes it possible to generate novel genome-enhanced DNA detection assays that can exploit whole genomes to discover candidate genes for pathogen detection. A pipeline was developed to identify genome regions that discriminate taxa or groups of taxa and can be converted into PCR assays. The modular pipeline is comprised of four components: (1) selection and genome sequencing of phylogenetically related taxa, (2) identification of clusters of orthologous genes, (3) elimination of false positives by filtering, and (4) assay design. This pipeline was applied to some of the most important plant pathogens across three broad taxonomic groups: Phytophthoras (Stramenopiles, Oomycota), Dothideomycetes (Fungi, Ascomycota) and Pucciniales (Fungi, Basidiomycota). Comparison of 73 fungal and Oomycete genomes led the discovery of 5,939 gene clusters that were unique to the targeted taxa and an additional 535 that were common at higher taxonomic levels. Approximately 28% of the 299 tested were converted into qPCR assays that met our set of specificity criteria. This work demonstrates that a genome-wide approach can efficiently identify multiple taxon-specific genome regions that can be converted into highly specific PCR assays. The possibility to easily obtain multiple alternative regions to design highly specific qPCR assays should be of great help in tackling challenging cases for which higher taxon-resolution is needed.

Indexed as

Detection and identificationDiagnosticsGenomicsMycologyPlant pathogenPlant pathogens

Identifiers

PMID29492338
PMCPMC5825881
OpenAlexW2788216798

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.