ReviewVirus evolution2016
Challenges in the analysis of viral metagenomes.
Review in Virus evolution, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 54 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
54 citing papers in PubMed.
- Viral metagenomic analysis of the blood virome in patients with multiple autoimmune diseases.Virology journal · 2026Article
- An evaluation of computational methods for reconstruction of human viral DNA genomes.GigaScience · 2026Article
- Virus taxonomy: the database of the International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses.Nucleic acids research · 2026Article
- Methods, applications, and computational challenges in bait capture enrichment.Cell reports methods · 2025Review
- Deep Learning Transforms Phage-Host Interaction Discovery from Metagenomic Data.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- varVAMP: degenerate primer design for tiled full genome sequencing and qPCR.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Article
- Virseqimprover: an integrated pipeline for viral contig error correction, extension, and annotation.PeerJ · 2025Article
- Gut Virome of Tibetan Pigs Reveals the Diversity, Composition, and Distribution of Potential Novel Viruses/Variants.Transboundary and emerging diseases · 2025Article
- The TELCoMB Protocol for High-Sensitivity Detection of ARG-MGE Colocalizations in Complex Microbial Communities.Current protocols · 2024Article
- Article
- Phage-inclusive profiling of human gut microbiomes with Phanta.Nature biotechnology · 2024Article
- VirGrapher: a graph-based viral identifier for long sequences from metagenomes.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2024Article
- IPEV: identification of prokaryotic and eukaryotic virus-derived sequences in virome using deep learning.GigaScience · 2024Article
- Metagenomic and Molecular Detection of Novel Fecal Viruses in Free-Ranging Agile Wallabies.EcoHealth · 2023Article
- VIRify: An integrated detection, annotation and taxonomic classification pipeline using virus-specific protein profile hidden Markov models.PLoS computational biology · 2023Article
- Respiratory eukaryotic virome expansion and bacteriophage deficiency characterize childhood asthma.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- The Virome of Bats Inhabiting Brazilian Biomes: Knowledge Gaps and Biases towards Zoonotic Viruses.Microbiology spectrum · 2023Review
- Identification and characterization of two closely related virga-like viruses latently infecting rubber trees (Frontiers in microbiology · 2023Article
- Investigation of the Virome and Characterization of Issyk-Kul Virus from SwedishPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Genome sequencing technologies continue to develop with remarkable pace, yet analytical approaches for reconstructing and classifying viral genomes from mixed samples remain limited in their performance and usability. Existing solutions generally target expert users and often have unclear scope, making it challenging to critically evaluate their performance. There is a growing need for intuitive analytical tooling for researchers lacking specialist computing expertise and that is applicable in diverse experimental circumstances. Notable technical challenges have impeded progress; for example, fragments of viral genomes are typically orders of magnitude less abundant than those of host, bacteria, and/or other organisms in clinical and environmental metagenomes; observed viral genomes often deviate considerably from reference genomes demanding use of exhaustive alignment approaches; high intrapopulation viral diversity can lead to ambiguous sequence reconstruction; and finally, the relatively few documented viral reference genomes compared to the estimated number of distinct viral taxa renders classification problematic. Various software tools have been developed to accommodate the unique challenges and use cases associated with characterizing viral sequences; however, the quality of these tools varies, and their use often necessitates computing expertise or access to powerful computers, thus limiting their usefulness to many researchers. In this review, we consider the general and application-specific challenges posed by viral sequencing and analysis, outline the landscape of available tools and methodologies, and propose ways of overcoming the current barriers to effective analysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.