ReviewClinical practice and epidemiology in mental health : CP & EMH2018
Active Aging and Elderly's Quality of Life: Comparing the Impact on Literature of Projects Funded by the European Union and USA.
Review in Clinical practice and epidemiology in mental health : CP & EMH, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effect of Health Promotion Interventions in Active Aging in the Elderly: A Randomized Controlled Trial.International journal of community based nursing and midwifery · 2023Trial
- Cultivating Well-Being: An Exploratory Analysis of the Integral Benefits of Urban Gardens in the Promotion of Active Ageing.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025Article
- Principal Component Analysis of the Social and Behavioral Rhythms Scale in elderly.Journal of public health research · 2021Article
- Life satisfaction and depressive symptoms of mentally active older adults in Poland: a cross-sectional study.BMC geriatrics · 2021Article
- Thematic research clusters in very old populations (≥ 80 years): a bibliometric approach.BMC geriatrics · 2021Article
- The Quality of Life of People with Solid Cancer is Less Worse than Other Diseases with better Prognosis, Except in the Presence of Depression.Clinical practice and epidemiology in mental health : CP & EMH · 2021Article
- Current issues in the scientific cooperation in Europe.European child & adolescent psychiatry · 2020Article
- Technological Ecosystems in the Health Sector: a Mapping Study of European Research Projects.Journal of medical systems · 2019Article
- The Relevance of the Research on the Psychosocial Dimensions of Aging Is Really the Same in Europe and USA?Clinical practice and epidemiology in mental health : CP & EMH · 2019Article
- Cost-effectiveness of US National Institute of Health and European Union FP7 Projects on Active Ageing and Elderly Quality of Life-Author's reply.Clinical practice and epidemiology in mental health : CP & EMH · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe objective of this research is to verify whether European projects on Active Aging (AA) and Elderly Quality of Life (Qol) funded by the Seventh Framework Programme (FP7) produce an impact on literature similar to projects funded by the National Health Institute (NHI) of the United States on international literature using well-known bibliometric indicators. This effort may be useful in developing standardized and replicable procedures.
methodsFifteen randomly selected projects on AA and Elderly Qol concluded in August 2017 and funded by FP7 were compared to similar projects funded by the US NHI with reference to papers published (Scopus and Scholar), papers published in Q1 journals, and the number of citations of the papers linked to the projects.
resultsIn all the indicators considered, the European projects showed no difference with the US NHI projects.
conclusionsThe EU-funded AA and Qol Elderly projects have an impact on scientific literature comparable to projects funded in the United States by the NHI Agency.Our results are consistent with the data on general medical research, which indicates that, European research remains at a high level of competitiveness.In this experimental study, our methodology appeared to be convincing and reliable and it could be applied to the extent of the impact of more extensive research areas.Our research did not evaluate the relationship between funding required by research and scientific productivity.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.