Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29491978›Full record

ArticleCurrent zoology2017

Urban health and ecology: the promise of an avian biomonitoring tool.

Lea Pollack, Naomi R Ondrasek, Rebecca Calisi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current zoology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Biomonitoring of Toxic Metals in Feathers of Birds from North-Eastern Pakistan.Bulletin of environmental contamination and toxicology · 2021
    Article
  5. Bird feathers are potential biomonitors for airborne elemental carbon.Environmental monitoring and assessment · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Lea PollackDepartment of Environmental Science and Policy, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, USA.
Naomi R OndrasekDepartment of Neurobiology, Physiology, and Behavior, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, USA.
Rebecca CalisiDepartment of Neurobiology, Physiology, and Behavior, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Urban-dwelling birds have the potential to serve as powerful biomonitors that reveal the impact of environmental change due to urbanization. Specifically, urban bird populations can be used to survey cities for factors that may pose both public and wildlife health concerns. Here, we review evidence supporting the use of avian biomonitors to identify threats associated with urbanization, including bioaccumulation of toxicants and the dysregulation of behavior and physiology by related stressors. In addition, we consider the use of birds to examine how factors in the urban environment can impact immunity against communicable pathogens. By studying the behavior, physiology, and ecology of urban bird populations, we can elucidate not only how avian populations are responding to environmental change, but also how unintended consequences of urbanization affect the well-being of human and non-human inhabitants.

Indexed as

avian biomonitorpollutant bioaccumulationurban ecologyzoonotic disease.

Identifiers

PMID29491978
PMCPMC5804165

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.