Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29491950›Full record

ArticleCurrent zoology2016

Marine invasions enter the genomic era: three lessons from the past, and the way forward.

Frédérique Viard, Patrice David, John A Darling

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current zoology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. The reconstruction of invasion histories with genomic data in light of differing levels of anthropogenic transport.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2022
    Article
  7. Genomics-informed models reveal extensive stretches of coastline under threat by an ecologically dominant invasive species.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Anthropogenic hybridization at sea: three evolutionary questions relevant to invasive species management.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2020
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. An evolutionary perspective on marine invasions.Evolutionary applications · 2020
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Frédérique ViardSorbonne Universités, UPMC Univ Paris 06, CNRS, UMR 7144, Lab. Adaptation Et Diversité En Milieu Marin, Team Div&Co, Station Biologique De Roscoff, Roscoff 29682, France.
Patrice DavidCEFE UMR 5175, CNRS-Université De Montpellier-UM III-EPHE, 1919 Route De Mende, Montpellier Cedex 34293, France.
John A DarlingNational Exposure Research Laboratory, United States Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The expanding scale and increasing rate of marine biological invasions have been documented since the early 20th century. Besides their global ecological and economic impacts, non-indigenous species (NIS) also have attracted much attention as opportunities to explore important eco-evolutionary processes such as rapid adaptation, long-distance dispersal and range expansion, and secondary contacts between divergent evolutionary lineages. In this context, genetic tools have been extensively used in the past 20 years. Three important issues appear to have emerged from such studies. First, the study of NIS has revealed unexpected cryptic diversity in what had previously been assumed homogeneous entities. Second, there has been surprisingly little evidence of strong founder events accompanying marine introductions, a pattern possibly driven by large propagule loads. Third, the evolutionary processes leading to successful invasion have been difficult to ascertain due to faint genetic signals. Here we explore the potential of novel tools associated with high-throughput sequencing (HTS) to address these still pressing issues. Dramatic increase in the number of loci accessible via HTS has the potential to radically increase the power of analyses aimed at species delineation, exploring the population genomic consequences of range expansions, and examining evolutionary processes such as admixture, introgression, and adaptation. Nevertheless, the value of this new wealth of genomic data will ultimately depend on the ability to couple it with expanded "traditional" efforts, including exhaustive sampling of marine populations over large geographic scales, integrated taxonomic analyses, and population level exploration of quantitative trait differentiation through common-garden and other laboratory experiments.

Indexed as

biological invasionscryptic speciescryptogenic specieseco-evolutionary processesgenomicsmetabarcoding.

Identifiers

PMID29491950
PMCPMC5804250

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.