Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29491743›Full record

ReviewCurrent genomics2018

Anzhelika Butenko, Tamara da Silva Vieira, Alexander O Frolov, Fred R Opperdoes, Rodrigo P Soares, Alexei Yu Kostygov, Julius Lukeš, Vyacheslav Yurchenko

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current genomics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Frequent Recombination Events inPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 5 countries.

Anzhelika ButenkoLife Science Research Centre, Faculty of Science, University of Ostrava, 710 00 Ostrava, Czech Republic.
Tamara da Silva VieiraCentro de Pesquisas Rene Rachou/FIOCRUZ, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, 30190-002, Brazil.
Alexander O FrolovZoological Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences, St. Petersburg199034, Russia.
Fred R Opperdoesde Duve Institute, Université Catholique de Louvain, 1200, Brussels, Belgium.
Rodrigo P SoaresCentro de Pesquisas Rene Rachou/FIOCRUZ, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, 30190-002, Brazil.
Alexei Yu KostygovLife Science Research Centre, Faculty of Science, University of Ostrava, 710 00 Ostrava, Czech Republic.
Julius LukešBiology Centre, Institute of Parasitology, Czech Academy of Sciences, 370 05 České Budejovice (Budweis), Czech Republic.
Vyacheslav YurchenkoLife Science Research Centre, Faculty of Science, University of Ostrava, 710 00 Ostrava, Czech Republic.
University of Ostrava · CZFundação Oswaldo Cruz · BRCanadian Institute for Advanced Research · CAde Duve Institute · BEZoological Institute · RU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLeptomonas pyrrhocoris is a parasite of the firebug Pyrrhocoris apterus. This flagellate has been recently proposed as a model species for studying different aspects of the biology of monoxenous trypanosomatids, including host - parasite interactions. During its life cycle L. pyrrhocoris never tightly attaches to the epithelium of the insect gut. In contrast, its dixenous relatives (Leishmania spp.) establish a stable infection via attachment to the intestinal walls of their insect hosts. MATERIAL AND

methodsThis process is mediated by chemical modifications of the cell surface lipophosphoglycans. In our study we tested whether the inability of L. pyrrhocoris to attach to the firebug's midgut is associated with the absence of these glycoconjugates. We also analyzed evolution of the proteins involved in proper lipophosphoglycan assembly, cell attachment and establishment of a stable infection in L. pyrrhocoris, L. seymouri, and Leishmania spp. Our comparative analysis demonstrated differences in SCG/L/R repertoire between the two parasite subgenera, Leishmania and Viannia, which may be related to distinct life strategies in various Leishmania spp. The genome of L. pyrrhocoris encodes 6 SCG genes, all of which are quite divergent from their orthologs in the genus Leishmania. Using direct probing with an antibody recognizing the β-Gal side chains of lipophosphoglycans, we confirmed that these structures are not synthesized in L. pyrrhocoris.

conclusionWe conclude that either the SCG enzymes are not active in this species (similarly to SCG5/7 in L. major), or they possess a different biochemical activity.

Indexed as

Host-parasite interactionInsect gut's attachmentLPGL. pyrrhocorisMonoxenous trypanosomatidsSCG enzymes

Identifiers

PMID29491743
PMCPMC5814963
OpenAlexW2747549002

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.