Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29491405›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2018

Deep Residual Network Predicts Cortical Representation and Organization of Visual Features for Rapid Categorization.

Haiguang Wen, Junxing Shi, Wei Chen, Zhongming Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Deep learning in fetal, infant, and toddler neuroimaging research.Developmental cognitive neuroscience · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Modeling NeurodegenerationFrontiers in neuroinformatics · 2021
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Haiguang WenSchool of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA.
Junxing ShiSchool of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3044-3139
Wei ChenCenter for Magnetic Resonance Research, Department of Radiology, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Zhongming LiuWeldon School of Biomedical Engineering, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA. zmliu@purdue.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-8773-4204

Funding

Integrated fMRI Methods to Study Neurophysiology and Circuit Dynamics at Laminar and Columnar LevelR01MH111413 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI CHEN, WEI · 2016 to 2020
$4.4M
Multimodal Hyperspectral Imaging of Brain Activity and ConnectivityR01MH104402 · NIMH · PURDUE UNIVERSITY · PI LIU, ZHONGMING · 2014 to 2018
$2.3M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH104402NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH111413
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The brain represents visual objects with topographic cortical patterns. To address how distributed visual representations enable object categorization, we established predictive encoding models based on a deep residual network, and trained them to predict cortical responses to natural movies. Using this predictive model, we mapped human cortical representations to 64,000 visual objects from 80 categories with high throughput and accuracy. Such representations covered both the ventral and dorsal pathways, reflected multiple levels of object features, and preserved semantic relationships between categories. In the entire visual cortex, object representations were organized into three clusters of categories: biological objects, non-biological objects, and background scenes. In a finer scale specific to each cluster, object representations revealed sub-clusters for further categorization. Such hierarchical clustering of category representations was mostly contributed by cortical representations of object features from middle to high levels. In summary, this study demonstrates a useful computational strategy to characterize the cortical organization and representations of visual features for rapid categorization.

Indexed as

Models, NeurologicalNeural Networks, ComputerHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingPhotic StimulationTime FactorsVisual Cortex

Identifiers

PMID29491405
PMCPMC5830584

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.