Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29491377›Full record

ArticleNature communications2018

Characterizing the replicability of cell types defined by single cell RNA-sequencing data using MetaNeighbor.

Megan Crow, Anirban Paul, Sara Ballouz, Z Josh Huang, Jesse Gillis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 221 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
221citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

221 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. An Integrated Multi-omics Single Cell Atlas of the Human RPE and Choroid.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

161 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Megan CrowCold Spring Harbor Laboratory, One Bungtown Road, Cold Spring Harbor, NY, 11724, USA.
Anirban PaulCold Spring Harbor Laboratory, One Bungtown Road, Cold Spring Harbor, NY, 11724, USA.
Sara BallouzCold Spring Harbor Laboratory, One Bungtown Road, Cold Spring Harbor, NY, 11724, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4701-3020
Z Josh HuangCold Spring Harbor Laboratory, One Bungtown Road, Cold Spring Harbor, NY, 11724, USA.
Jesse GillisCold Spring Harbor Laboratory, One Bungtown Road, Cold Spring Harbor, NY, 11724, USA. jgillis@cshl.edu.

Funding

Genetic analysis of chandelier cells during cortical circuit assemblyR01MH094705 · NIMH · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI HUANG, Z JOSH · 2011 to 2022
$5.8M
Transcriptome-based systematic discovery of GABAergic neurons in the neocortexR01MH109665 · NIMH · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI HUANG, Z JOSH · 2016 to 2020
$4.0M
Revealing the transcriptomic basis of neuronal identity through functional meta-analysisR01MH113005 · NIMH · COLD SPRING HARBOR LABORATORY · PI GILLIS, JESSE · 2017 to 2021
$2.4M
Heuristics to evaluate biomedical and genomic knowledge bases for validityR01LM012736 · NLM · COLD SPRING HARBOR LABORATORY · PI GILLIS, JESSE · 2017 to 2020
$1.9M
Meta-analysis to define neuronal diversity: from genes to functions across speciesF32MH114501 · NIMH · COLD SPRING HARBOR LABORATORY · PI CROW, MEGAN · 2017 to 2018
$111k
NIMH NIH HHS F32 MH114501NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH094705NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH109665NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH113005NLM NIH HHS R01 LM012736
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Single-cell RNA-sequencing (scRNA-seq) technology provides a new avenue to discover and characterize cell types; however, the experiment-specific technical biases and analytic variability inherent to current pipelines may undermine its replicability. Meta-analysis is further hampered by the use of ad hoc naming conventions. Here we demonstrate our replication framework, MetaNeighbor, that quantifies the degree to which cell types replicate across datasets, and enables rapid identification of clusters with high similarity. We first measure the replicability of neuronal identity, comparing results across eight technically and biologically diverse datasets to define best practices for more complex assessments. We then apply this to novel interneuron subtypes, finding that 24/45 subtypes have evidence of replication, which enables the identification of robust candidate marker genes. Across tasks we find that large sets of variably expressed genes can identify replicable cell types with high accuracy, suggesting a general route forward for large-scale evaluation of scRNA-seq data.

Indexed as

Computational BiologyGene Expression ProfilingHumansNeuronsRNASequence Analysis, RNASingle-Cell AnalysisRNA

Identifiers

PMID29491377
PMCPMC5830442

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.