Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29491168›Full record

ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2018

Integrating morphology and kinematics in the scaling of hummingbird hovering metabolic rate and efficiency.

Derrick J E Groom, M Cecilia B Toledo, Donald R Powers, Bret W Tobalske, Kenneth C Welch

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Derrick J E GroomDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Toronto Scarborough, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M1C 1A4 dgroom@umass.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-9300-9116
M Cecilia B ToledoInstituto Bàsico de Biociências, Universidade de Taubaté, Taubaté, SP, 12010-180, Brazil.
Donald R PowersDepartment of Biology, George Fox University, Newberg, OR 97132, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1126-7141
Bret W TobalskeDivision of Biological Sciences, University of Montana, Missoula, MT 59812, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5739-6099
Kenneth C WelchDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Toronto Scarborough, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M1C 1A4.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Wing kinematics and morphology are influential upon the aerodynamics of flight. However, there is a lack of studies linking these variables to metabolic costs, particularly in the context of morphological adaptation to body size. Furthermore, the conversion efficiency from chemical energy into movement by the muscles (mechanochemical efficiency) scales with mass in terrestrial quadrupeds, but this scaling relationship has not been demonstrated within flying vertebrates. Positive scaling of efficiency with body size may reduce the metabolic costs of flight for relatively larger species. Here, we assembled a dataset of morphological, kinematic, and metabolic data on hovering hummingbirds to explore the influence of wing morphology, efficiency, and mass on hovering metabolic rate (HMR). We hypothesize that HMR would decline with increasing wing size, after accounting for mass. Furthermore, we hypothesize that efficiency will increase with mass, similarly to other forms of locomotion. We do not find a relationship between relative wing size and HMR, and instead find that the cost of each wingbeat increases hyperallometrically while wingbeat frequency declines with increasing mass. This suggests that increasing wing size is metabolically favourable over cycle frequency with increasing mass. Further benefits are offered to larger hummingbirds owing to the positive scaling of efficiency.

Indexed as

Body SizeEnergy MetabolismFlight, AnimalAnimalsBiomechanical PhenomenaBirdsBrazilefficiencyelevationhummingbirdsmetabolic ratescalingwing morphology

Identifiers

PMID29491168
PMCPMC5832699

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.