Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29490970›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2018

Identifying primary care patient safety research priorities in the UK: a James Lind Alliance Priority Setting Partnership.

Rebecca Lauren Morris, Susan Jill Stocks, Rahul Alam, Sian Taylor, Carly Rolfe, Steven William Glover, Joanne Whitcombe, Stephen M Campbell

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Involving patients and carers in patient safety in primary care: A qualitative study of a co-designed patient safety guide.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2023
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Analysis of Patient Safety Incidents in Primary Care Reported in an Electronic Registry Application.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  18. Medication-related harm in New Zealand general practice: a retrospective records review.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2021
    Article
  19. Developing a patient safety guide for primary care: A co-design approach involving patients, carers and clinicians.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2021
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Rebecca Lauren MorrisNIHR Greater Manchester Patient Safety Translational Research Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1587-0802
Susan Jill StocksNIHR Greater Manchester Patient Safety Translational Research Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Rahul AlamNIHR Greater Manchester Patient Safety Translational Research Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Sian TaylorNIHR Greater Manchester Patient Safety Translational Research Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Carly RolfeNIHR Greater Manchester Patient Safety Translational Research Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Steven William GloverTrust Library Service, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.
Joanne WhitcombeTrust Library Service, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.
Stephen M CampbellNIHR Greater Manchester Patient Safety Translational Research Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
University of Manchester · GBManchester University NHS Foundation Trust · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo identify the top 10 unanswered research questions for primary care patient safety research.

designA modified nominal group technique.

settingUK.

participantsAnyone with experience of primary care including: patients, carers and healthcare professionals. 341 patients and 86 healthcare professionals submitted questions. MAIN OUTCOMES: A top 10, and top 30, future research questions for primary care patient safety.

results443 research questions were submitted by 341 patients and 86 healthcare professionals, through a national survey. After checking for relevance and rephrasing, a total of 173 questions were collated into themes. The themes were largely focused on communication, team and system working, interfaces across primary and secondary care, medication, self-management support and technology. The questions were then prioritised through a national survey, the top 30 questions were taken forward to the final prioritisation workshop. The top 10 research questions focused on the most vulnerable in society, holistic whole-person care, safer communication and coordination between care providers, work intensity, continuity of care, suicide risk, complex care at home and confidentiality.

conclusionsThis study was the first national prioritisation exercise to identify patient and healthcare professional priorities for primary care patient safety research. The research priorities identified a range of important gaps in the existing evidence to inform everyday practice to address primary care patient safety.

Indexed as

Patient ParticipationPatient SafetyAdolescentAdultAgedBiomedical ResearchFemaleHealth PrioritiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrimary Health CareSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited KingdomYoung Adultgeneral practiceJames Lind Alliancepatient safetypharmacyprimary care

Identifiers

PMID29490970
PMCPMC5855454
OpenAlexW2786846426

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.