Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29490957›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2018

Do female sex workers have lower uptake of HIV treatment services than non-sex workers? A cross-sectional study from east Zimbabwe.

Rebecca Rhead, Jocelyn Elmes, Eloghene Otobo, Kundai Nhongo, Albert Takaruza, Peter J White, Constance Anesu Nyamukapa, Simon Gregson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Improving Underestimation of HIV Prevalence in Surveys Using Time-Location Sampling.Journal of urban health : bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine · 2021
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Rebecca Rhead *Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Imperial College London School of Public Health, London, UK.
Jocelyn Elmes *Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Imperial College London School of Public Health, London, UK.
Eloghene OtoboDepartment of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Imperial College London School of Public Health, London, UK.
Kundai NhongoBiomedical Research and Training Institute, Harare, Zimbabwe.
Albert TakaruzaBiomedical Research and Training Institute, Harare, Zimbabwe.
Peter J WhiteDepartment of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Imperial College London School of Public Health, London, UK.
Constance Anesu NyamukapaDepartment of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Imperial College London School of Public Health, London, UK.
Simon GregsonDepartment of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Imperial College London School of Public Health, London, UK.

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/K010174/1Medical Research Council MR/R015600/1Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveGlobally, HIV disproportionately affects female sex workers (FSWs) yet HIV treatment coverage is suboptimal. To improve uptake of HIV services by FSWs, it is important to identify potential inequalities in access and use of care and their determinants. Our aim is to investigate HIV treatment cascades for FSWs and non-sex workers (NSWs) in Manicaland province, Zimbabwe, and to examine the socio-demographic characteristics and intermediate determinants that might explain differences in service uptake.

methodsData from a household survey conducted in 2009-2011 and a parallel snowball sample survey of FSWs were matched using probability methods to reduce under-reporting of FSWs. HIV treatment cascades were constructed and compared for FSWs (n=174) and NSWs (n=2555). Determinants of service uptake were identified a priori in a theoretical framework and tested using logistic regression.

resultsHIV prevalence was higher in FSWs than in NSWs (52.6% vs 19.8%; age-adjusted OR (AOR) 4.0; 95% CI 2.9 to 5.5). In HIV-positive women, FSWs were more likely to have been diagnosed (58.2% vs 42.6%; AOR 1.62; 1.02-2.59) and HIV-diagnosed FSWs were more likely to initiate ART (84.9% vs 64.0%; AOR 2.33; 1.03-5.28). No difference was found for antiretroviral treatment (ART) adherence (91.1% vs 90.5%; P=0.9). FSWs' greater uptake of HIV treatment services became non-significant after adjusting for intermediate factors including HIV knowledge and risk perception, travel time to services, physical and mental health, and recent pregnancy.

conclusionFSWs are more likely to take up testing and treatment services and were closer to achieving optimal outcomes along the cascade compared with NSWs. However, ART coverage was low in all women at the time of the survey. FSWs' need for, knowledge of and proximity to HIV testing and treatment facilities appear to increase uptake.

Indexed as

Drug MonitoringAdultAnti-Retroviral AgentsCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHIV InfectionsHumansLogistic ModelsMiddle AgedPatient Acceptance of Health CarePrevalenceSex WorkersTime FactorsTravelYoung AdultAnti-Retroviral Agentsepidemiologypublic health

Identifiers

PMID29490957
PMCPMC5855339

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.