Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29490769›Full record

Trial reportAllergy and asthma proceedings2018

Safety of a novel intranasal formulation of azelastine hydrochloride and fluticasone propionate in children: A randomized clinical trial.

William Berger, Ellen Sher, Sandra Gawchik, Stanley Fineman

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Allergy and asthma proceedings, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01794741 (Randomized Trial of the Safety of Dymista Nasal Spray and Fluticasone Propionate Nasal Spray in Children Ages >4 Years to <12 Years With Allergic Rhinitis), which is not on this map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01794741 phase3completednot on this map

Randomized Trial of the Safety of Dymista Nasal Spray and Fluticasone Propionate Nasal Spray in Children Ages >4 Years to <12 Years With Allergic Rhinitis

TypeinterventionalSponsorMeda PharmaceuticalsRan2013Enrolled405ConditionsAllergic RhinitisArmsDymista Nasal Spray, Fluticasone propionate nasal spray
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. [Clinical observation of nasal spray allergen blocker combined with antihistamines in treatment of allergic rhinitis children].Lin chuang er bi yan hou tou jing wai ke za zhi = Journal of clinical otorhinolaryngology head and neck surgery · 2020
    Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

William BergerFrom the Allergy and Asthma Associates of Southern California, Mission Viejo, California, USA.
Ellen SherAtlantic Allergy, Asthma and Immunology Associates of New Jersey, Ocean, New Jersey, USA.
Sandra GawchikAsthma Allergy Associates, Glen Mills, Pennsylvania, USA.
Stanley FinemanAtlanta Allergy and Asthma Clinic, Marietta, Georgia, USA.
Asthma and Allergy Specialists · USAtlanta Allergy and Asthma Clinic · USCalifornia Allergy and Asthma Medical Group · USPulmonary and Allergy Associates · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe safety of a novel intranasal formulation of azelastine hydrochloride (AZE) and fluticasone propionate (FP) has been established in adults and adolescents with allergic rhinitis but not in children <12 years old.

objectiveTo evaluate the safety and tolerability of an intranasal formulation of AZE and FP in children ages 4-11 years with allergic rhinitis.

methodsThe study was a randomized, 3-month, parallel-group, open-label design. Qualified patients were randomized in a 3:1 ratio to AZE/FP (n = 304) or fluticasone propionate (FP) (n = 101), one spray per nostril twice daily, and to one of three age groups: ≥4 to <6 years, ≥6 to <9 years, and ≥9 to <12 years. Safety was assessed by child- or caregiver-reported adverse events, nasal examinations, vital signs, and laboratory assessments.

resultsThe incidence of treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) was low in both the AZE/FP (16%) and FP-only (12%) groups after 90 days' continuous use. Epistaxis was the most frequently reported TRAE in both groups (AZE/FP, 9%; FP, 9%), followed by headache (AZE/FP, 3%; FP, 1%). All other TRAEs in the AZE/FP group were reported by ≤1% of the children. The majority of TRAEs were of mild intensity and resolved spontaneously. Results of nasal examinations showed an improvement over time in both groups, with no cases of mucosal ulceration or nasal septal perforation. There were no unusual or unexpected changes in laboratory parameters or vital signs.

conclusionThe intranasal formulation of AZE and FP was safe and well tolerated after 3 months' continuous use in children with allergic rhinitis.The study was registered on <ext-link xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://ClinicalTrials.gov">ClinicalTrials.gov</ext-link> (NCT01794741).

Indexed as

Administration, IntranasalAnti-Allergic AgentsChildChild, PreschoolDrug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsFemaleFluticasoneHumansIncidenceMaleNasal SpraysPhthalazinesRhinitis, AllergicTreatment OutcomeUnited StatesAnti-Allergic AgentsazelastineFluticasoneNasal SpraysPhthalazines

Identifiers

PMID29490769
PMCPMC5827154
OpenAlexW2793440500

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.