Trial reportAllergy and asthma proceedings2018
Safety of a novel intranasal formulation of azelastine hydrochloride and fluticasone propionate in children: A randomized clinical trial.
Trial report in Allergy and asthma proceedings, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01794741 (Randomized Trial of the Safety of Dymista Nasal Spray and Fluticasone Propionate Nasal Spray in Children Ages >4 Years to <12 Years With Allergic Rhinitis), which is not on this map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Randomized Trial of the Safety of Dymista Nasal Spray and Fluticasone Propionate Nasal Spray in Children Ages >4 Years to <12 Years With Allergic Rhinitis
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.
- [Clinical observation of nasal spray allergen blocker combined with antihistamines in treatment of allergic rhinitis children].Lin chuang er bi yan hou tou jing wai ke za zhi = Journal of clinical otorhinolaryngology head and neck surgery · 2020Trial
- Current Insights Into Individualized Diagnosis and Treatment of Allergic Rhinitis Based on Phenotype and Endotype.World journal of otorhinolaryngology - head and neck surgery · 2026Review
- Azelastine-Fluticasone Combination Therapy in Allergic Rhinitis: Current Evidence and Clinical Implications in Children and Adults.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Evaluation of Comparative Efficacy of Polyherbal Steam Inhalation Versus Polyherbal Nasal Fumigation (Dhoopana) in Children With Rhinitis (Pratishyaya): Protocol for an Open-Label Randomized Controlled Trial.JMIR research protocols · 2025Article
- The Use of Azelastine Hydrochloride/Fluticasone Propionate in the Management of Allergic Rhinitis in Asia: A Review.Journal of asthma and allergy · 2024Review
- Article
- The Multidirectional Effect of Azelastine Hydrochloride on Cervical Cancer Cells.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
- The Effectiveness of the Bacteria Derived Extremolyte Ectoine for the Treatment of Allergic Rhinitis.BioMed research international · 2021Review
- The Floralia: A festive time for Romans and a demanding time for the allergist/immunologist.Allergy and asthma proceedings · 2018Article
- Allergic diseases: A collection of interactive immunologic disorders at the crossroads of genetics, environment, and immunity.Allergy and asthma proceedings · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe safety of a novel intranasal formulation of azelastine hydrochloride (AZE) and fluticasone propionate (FP) has been established in adults and adolescents with allergic rhinitis but not in children <12 years old.
objectiveTo evaluate the safety and tolerability of an intranasal formulation of AZE and FP in children ages 4-11 years with allergic rhinitis.
methodsThe study was a randomized, 3-month, parallel-group, open-label design. Qualified patients were randomized in a 3:1 ratio to AZE/FP (n = 304) or fluticasone propionate (FP) (n = 101), one spray per nostril twice daily, and to one of three age groups: ≥4 to <6 years, ≥6 to <9 years, and ≥9 to <12 years. Safety was assessed by child- or caregiver-reported adverse events, nasal examinations, vital signs, and laboratory assessments.
resultsThe incidence of treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) was low in both the AZE/FP (16%) and FP-only (12%) groups after 90 days' continuous use. Epistaxis was the most frequently reported TRAE in both groups (AZE/FP, 9%; FP, 9%), followed by headache (AZE/FP, 3%; FP, 1%). All other TRAEs in the AZE/FP group were reported by ≤1% of the children. The majority of TRAEs were of mild intensity and resolved spontaneously. Results of nasal examinations showed an improvement over time in both groups, with no cases of mucosal ulceration or nasal septal perforation. There were no unusual or unexpected changes in laboratory parameters or vital signs.
conclusionThe intranasal formulation of AZE and FP was safe and well tolerated after 3 months' continuous use in children with allergic rhinitis.The study was registered on <ext-link xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://ClinicalTrials.gov">ClinicalTrials.gov</ext-link> (NCT01794741).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.