Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29490701›Full record

ArticleBMC surgery2018

Pylorus drainage procedures in thoracoabdominal esophagectomy - a single-center experience and review of the literature.

Stefan Fritz, Katharina Feilhauer, André Schaudt, Hansjörg Killguss, Eduard Esianu, René Hennig, Jörg Köninger

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC surgery, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Delayed Gastric Emptying after Esophagectomy: Management and Prevention.The Korean journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery · 2020
    Article
  8. The Optimal Pyloric Procedure: A Collective Review.The Korean journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery · 2020
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Stefan FritzDepartment of General, Visceral, Thoracic and Transplantation Surgery, Katharinenhospital Stuttgart, Kriegsbergstraße 60, 70174, Stuttgart, Germany. st.fritz@klinikum-stuttgart.de.
Katharina FeilhauerDepartment of General, Visceral, Thoracic and Transplantation Surgery, Katharinenhospital Stuttgart, Kriegsbergstraße 60, 70174, Stuttgart, Germany.
André SchaudtDepartment of General, Visceral, Thoracic and Transplantation Surgery, Katharinenhospital Stuttgart, Kriegsbergstraße 60, 70174, Stuttgart, Germany.
Hansjörg KillgussDepartment of General, Visceral, Thoracic and Transplantation Surgery, Katharinenhospital Stuttgart, Kriegsbergstraße 60, 70174, Stuttgart, Germany.
Eduard EsianuDepartment of General, Visceral, Thoracic and Transplantation Surgery, Katharinenhospital Stuttgart, Kriegsbergstraße 60, 70174, Stuttgart, Germany.
René HennigDepartment of General, Visceral, Thoracic and Transplantation Surgery, Katharinenhospital Stuttgart, Kriegsbergstraße 60, 70174, Stuttgart, Germany.
Jörg KöningerDepartment of General, Visceral, Thoracic and Transplantation Surgery, Katharinenhospital Stuttgart, Kriegsbergstraße 60, 70174, Stuttgart, Germany.
Katharinenhospital · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPylorotomy and pyloroplasty in thoracoabdominal esophagectomy are routinely performed in many high-volume centers to prevent delayed gastric emptying (DGE) due to truncal vagotomy. Currently, controversy remains regarding the need for these practices. The present study aimed to determine the value and role of pyloric drainage procedures in esophagectomy with gastric replacement.

methodsA retrospective review of prospectively collected data was performed for all consecutive patients who underwent thoracoabdominal resection of the esophagus between January 2009 and December 2016 at the Katharinenhospital in Stuttgart, Germany. Clinicopathologic features and surgical outcomes were evaluated with a focus on postoperative nutrition and gastric emptying.

resultsThe study group included 170 patients who underwent thoracoabdominal esophageal resection with a gastric conduit using the Ivor Lewis approach. The median age of the patients was 64 years. Most patients were male (81%), and most suffered from adenocarcinoma of the esophagus (75%). The median hospital stay was 20 days, and the 30-day hospital death rate was 2.9%. According to the department standard, pylorotomy, pyloroplasty, or other pyloric drainage procedures were not performed in any of the patients. Overall, 28/170 patients showed clinical signs of DGE (16.5%).

conclusionsIn the literature, the rate of DGE after thoracoabdominal esophagectomy is reported to be approximately 15%, even with the use of pyloric drainage procedures. This rate is comparable to that reported in the present series in which no pyloric drainage procedures were performed. Therefore, we believe that pyloric drainage procedures may be unwarranted in thoracoabdominal esophagectomy. However, future randomized trials are needed to ultimately confirm this supposition.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaAdultAgedAged, 80 and overDrainageEsophageal NeoplasmsEsophagectomyFemaleGastroparesisGermanyHumansLength of StayMaleMiddle AgedPlastic Surgery ProceduresPostoperative ComplicationsDelayed gastric emptyingPyloroplastyPylorotomyPylorus drainageThoracoabdominal esophagectomy

Identifiers

PMID29490701
PMCPMC5831596
OpenAlexW2792441470

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.