Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29490661›Full record

Trial reportBMC veterinary research2018

Effect of tear collection on lacrimal total protein content in dogs and cats: a comparison between Schirmer strips and ophthalmic sponges.

Lionel Sebbag, Emily M McDowell, Patrick M Hepner, Jonathan P Mochel

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC veterinary research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Changes in Tear Proteomic Profile in Ocular Diseases.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Tear Film Proteome of Healthy Domestic Cats.Veterinary medicine international · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Development of a Quantitative Immunoassay for Tear Lacritin Proteoforms.Translational vision science & technology · 2020
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Fluorophotometric Assessment of Tear Volume and Turnover Rate in Healthy Dogs and Cats.Journal of ocular pharmacology and therapeutics : the official journal of the Association for Ocular Pharmacology and Therapeutics · 2019
    Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Lionel SebbagDepartment of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, Iowa State University, College of Veterinary Medicine, Ames, IA, 50011, USA. lsebbag@iastate.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0103-0127
Emily M McDowellLloyd Veterinary Medical Center, Iowa State University, College of Veterinary Medicine, Ames, IA, 50011, USA.
Patrick M HepnerLloyd Veterinary Medical Center, Iowa State University, College of Veterinary Medicine, Ames, IA, 50011, USA.
Jonathan P MochelDepartment of Biomedical sciences, Iowa State University, College of Veterinary Medicine, Ames, IA, 50011, USA.
Iowa State University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundQuantification of lacrimal total protein content (TPC) is an important tool for clinical scientists to understand disease pathogenesis, identify potential biomarkers and assess response to therapy, among other applications. However, TPC is not only affected by disease state but also by the method used for tear collection. Thus, the purpose of this study is to determine the impact on TPC of two methods of tear collection in dogs and cats: Schirmer strips and polyvinyl acetal (PVA) sponges.

methods(i) In vivo - Ten healthy dogs and 10 healthy cats were examined. Each animal underwent two sessions, separated by 10 min, in which a Schirmer strip was placed in one randomly selected eye until the 20-mm mark was reached, while a strip of PVA sponge was placed in the other eye for 1 min. (ii) In vitro - Schirmer strips and PVA sponges were spiked with various volumes of four bovine serum albumin solutions (0.5, 4, 10, and 20 mg/mL). In both experiments, the wetted absorbent materials were centrifuged for 1 min, and the TPC was quantified on the extracted fluid using Direct Detect™ infrared spectroscopy.

resultsLacrimal TPC in dogs and cats ranged from 5.2 to 14.6 mg/mL and from 6.2 to 20.6 mg/mL, respectively. In cats, TPC was significantly lower with Schirmer strips vs. PVA sponges (P < 0.001). In dogs, the volume absorbed by PVA sponges was negatively correlated with TPC (r = - 0.48, P = 0.033). The inter-session coefficient of variation was significantly lower with Schirmer strips vs. PVA sponges in both species (P ≤ 0.010). In vitro, both absorbent materials resulted in a 'concentrating effect' of the TPC obtained post-centrifugation, which was most pronounced when the volume absorbed was low, especially for Schirmer strips.

conclusionSchirmer strips provide a repeatable method to quantify lacrimal TPC in dogs and cats, although care should be taken to absorb sufficient volumes of tears to minimize the concentrating effect from the absorbent material.

Indexed as

AnimalsCatsDogsEye ProteinsFemaleLacrimal ApparatusMaleReagent StripsSpecimen HandlingSurgical SpongesTearsEye ProteinsReagent StripsOphthalmic spongeSchirmer tear testTear flowTear fluidTotal protein content

Identifiers

PMID29490661
PMCPMC5831202
OpenAlexW2798233231

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.