Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29490611›Full record

ArticleGenetics, selection, evolution : GSE2018

Large-scale genomic prediction using singular value decomposition of the genotype matrix.

Jørgen Ødegård, Ulf Indahl, Ismo Strandén, Theo H E Meuwissen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Efficient large-scale genomic prediction in approximate genome-based kernel model.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Current status of genomic evaluation.Journal of animal science · 2020
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Flexible modelling of spatial variation in agricultural field trials with the R package INLA.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jørgen ØdegårdAquaGen AS, P.O. Box 1240, 7462, Trondheim, Norway. jorgen.odegard@aquagen.no.ORCID 0000-0002-6068-1915
Ulf IndahlNorwegian University of Life Sciences, P.O. Box 5003, 1432, Ås, Norway.
Ismo StrandénNatural Resources Institute Finland (Luke), Humppilantie 14, Jokioinen, Finland.
Theo H E MeuwissenNorwegian University of Life Sciences, P.O. Box 5003, 1432, Ås, Norway.

Funding

Norges Forskningsråd 255297
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFor marker effect models and genomic animal models, computational requirements increase with the number of loci and the number of genotyped individuals, respectively. In the latter case, the inverse genomic relationship matrix (GRM) is typically needed, which is computationally demanding to compute for large datasets. Thus, there is a great need for dimensionality-reduction methods that can analyze massive genomic data. For this purpose, we developed reduced-dimension singular value decomposition (SVD) based models for genomic prediction.

methodsFast SVD is performed by analyzing different chromosomes/genome segments in parallel and/or by restricting SVD to a limited core of genotyped individuals, producing chromosome- or segment-specific principal components (PC). Given a limited effective population size, nearly all the genetic variation can be effectively captured by a limited number of PC. Genomic prediction can then be performed either by PC ridge regression (PCRR) or by genomic animal models using an inverse GRM computed from the chosen PC (PCIG). In the latter case, computation of the inverse GRM will be feasible for any number of genotyped individuals and can be readily produced row- or element-wise.

resultsUsing simulated data, we show that PCRR and PCIG models, using chromosome-wise SVD of a core sample of individuals, are appropriate for genomic prediction in a larger population, and results in virtually identical predicted breeding values as the original full-dimension genomic model (r = 1.000). Compared with other algorithms (e.g. algorithm for proven and young animals, APY), the (chromosome-wise SVD-based) PCRR and PCIG models were more robust to size of the core sample, giving nearly identical results even down to 500 core individuals. The method was also successfully tested on a large multi-breed dataset.

conclusionsSVD can be used for dimensionality reduction of large genomic datasets. After SVD, genomic prediction using dense genomic data and many genotyped individuals can be done in a computationally efficient manner. Using this method, the resulting genomic estimated breeding values were virtually identical to those computed from a full-dimension genomic model.

Indexed as

GenotypeModels, GeneticAlgorithmsAnimalsBreedingComputational BiologyComputer SimulationGenomePopulation DensityPrincipal Component Analysis

Identifiers

PMID29490611
PMCPMC5831701

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.