ArticleACS sensors2018
Developing Microfluidic Sensing Devices Using 3D Printing.
Article in ACS sensors, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed.
- Sidewall Patterning in 3D Micro/Nanosystems: A Review.Micromachines · 2026Review
- Reusable 3D-printed microfluidic-on-fabric with modular electrodes for point-of-care NaAnalytical and bioanalytical chemistry · 2026Article
- Review
- Organ-on-a-Chip Applications in Microfluidic Platforms.Micromachines · 2025Review
- Design and Fabrication of a 3D-Printed Microfluidic Immunoarray for Ultrasensitive Multiplexed Protein Detection.Micromachines · 2023Article
- Analysis of NSAIDs in Rat Plasma Using 3D-Printed Sorbents by LC-MS/MS: An Approach to Pre-Clinical Pharmacokinetic Studies.Pharmaceutics · 2023Article
- Advances in Microfluidics for Single Red Blood Cell Analysis.Biosensors · 2023Review
- Breaking the clean room barrier: exploring low-cost alternatives for microfluidic devices.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2023Review
- Smart 3D Printed Hydrogel Skin Wound Bandages: A Review.Polymers · 2022Review
- CaCOPolymers · 2022Article
- Fabrication of microtiter plate on paper using 96-well plates for wax stamping.Microfluidics and nanofluidics · 2022Article
- Flexible Materials for High-Resolution 3D Printing of Microfluidic Devices with Integrated Droplet Size Regulation.ACS applied materials & interfaces · 2021Article
- Biosensors Designed for Clinical Applications.Biomedicines · 2021Review
- Fabrication Methods for Microfluidic Devices: An Overview.Micromachines · 2021Review
- 3D Printing of PDMS-Like Polymer Nanocomposites with Enhanced Thermal Conductivity: Boron Nitride Based Photocuring System.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Detecting cancer metastasis and accompanying protein biomarkers at single cell levels using a 3D-printed microfluidic immunoarray.Biosensors & bioelectronics · 2021Article
- Novel Cost-Effective Microfluidic Chip Based on Hybrid Fabrication and Its Comprehensive Characterization.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019Article
- 3D Printed Sensors for Biomedical Applications: A Review.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019Review
- 3D-Printed Biosensor Arrays for Medical Diagnostics.Micromachines · 2018Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
This short perspective assesses the present landscape for desktop 3D printing to design and fabricate sensors, in particular, those associated with microfluidics and multiplexing. Lots of advanced devices have already been reported, and this article briefly surveys interesting achievements. Microfluidics can be designed and optimized faster and more easily on low cost desktop 3D printers that with competing methods. Rapid prototyping leads directly to a final (marketable) product fabricated on the same 3D printer. While resolution is not as good as lithographic approaches, very often channel and feature resolution on the order of 100 μm obtainable with SLA 3D printers is perfectly suitable for the desired sensing device. Two examples from our team's research are used to illustrate how using a 3D printer along with simple automation can reduce a complex microfluidic sensing procedure to a much simpler automated one. Future possibilities for sensor technology are discussed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.