ArticleJAMA cardiology2018
Association of Racial/Ethnic Categories With the Ability of Genetic Tests to Detect a Cause of Cardiomyopathy.
Article in JAMA cardiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 67 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
67 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 121 citations in OpenAlex.
- A multiancestry polygenic risk score improves stratification in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.Nature cardiovascular research · 2026Pooled it
- Geographical and Ethnic Heterogeneity in Genetic Dilated Cardiomyopathies.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Pooled it
- Association between IL10 rs1800896 polymorphism and risk of pediatric asthma: A meta-analysis.The clinical respiratory journal · 2023Pooled it
- A Genome-First Study of Familial Hypercholesterolemia Comparing African and European Ancestry Individuals.Circulation · 2026Article
- Evaluation of Women With Peripartum or Dilated Cardiomyopathy and Their First-Degree Relatives: The DCM Precision Medicine Study.Circulation. Genomic and precision medicine · 2026Observational
- Racial and socioeconomic disparities in genetic evaluation and testing in the adult patient population.American journal of human genetics · 2026Article
- Loss or Gain: Myosin Heavy Chain Truncations in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2025Article
- Investigating the frequency of unreported cases and laboratory correspondence practices for variants of uncertain significance in pediatric epilepsy.Epilepsia open · 2025Article
- Next-generation nephrology: part 2-mainstreaming genomics in nephrology, a global perspective.Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany) · 2025Review
- Breaking barriers: fostering equitable access to pediatric genomics through innovative care models and technologies.Pediatric research · 2025Review
- Atrial fibrillation in Black American patients: A review of genetics, risk factors, and outcomes.Heart rhythm · 2025Review
- Reproductive options and genetic testing for patients with an inherited cardiac disease.Nature reviews. Cardiology · 2025Review
- Striving Towards Equity in Cardiovascular Genomics Research.Current atherosclerosis reports · 2025Review
- Disparities in Genetic Testing for Inborn Errors of Immunity.The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. In practice · 2025Article
- Advancing Equity in Rare Disease Research: Insights From the Undiagnosed Disease Network.American journal of medical genetics. Part A · 2025Article
- Ancestry gaps in cardiovascular GWAS: a multi-database review of African representation in genomic studies.Frontiers in genetics · 2025Review
- Article
- Ethical and Legal Issues Surrounding Genetic Testing in the NICU.NeoReviews · 2024Article
- Characterizing the pathogenicity of genetic variants: the consequences of context.NPJ genomic medicine · 2024Article
- Artificial intelligence, medications, pharmacogenomics, and ethics.Pharmacogenomics · 2024Article
7 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: Individuals of all races/ethnicities have a fundamental right to access health care and benefit from advances in science and medicine, including genetic testing. Objective: To determine whether detection rates for cardiomyopathy genetic testing differed between white people, Asian people, and underrepresented minorities (individuals of black, Hispanic, Native American, Alaskan Native, or Pacific Islander descent). Design, Setting, and Participants: We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of the genetic panel test results of 5729 probands who had a suspected diagnosis or family history of cardiomyopathy and who had been referred for testing between October 2003 and December 2017. Testing was performed at the Laboratory for Molecular Medicine at Partners Personalized Medicine in Cambridge, Massachusetts. Results were stratified into 3 categories of self-reported race/ethnicity: white, Asian, and underrepresented minorities. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was whether a pathogenic or likely pathogenic variant was identified that explained the features or family history of cardiomyopathy. A secondary outcome was the number of test results that were inconclusive because of the presence of 1 or more variants of uncertain significance in the absence of an explanation for cardiomyopathy features or family history. Results: A total of 5729 probands were studied (of whom 3523 [61.5%] were male). Of these, 4539 (79.2%) were white, 348 (6.1%) were Asian individuals, and 842 (14.7%) were underrepresented minorities. Positive detection occurred in 1314 white individuals (29.0%) compared with 155 underrepresented minorities (18.4%; χ21 = 39.8; P < .001) and 87 Asian individuals (25.0%; χ21 = 2.5; P = .12). Inconclusive results were found in 1115 white individuals (24.6%) compared with 335 underrepresented minorities (39.8%; χ21 = 83.6; P < .001) and 136 Asian individuals (39.2%; χ21 = 35.8; P < .001). Conclusions and Relevance: These results show a significantly higher positive detection rate and a significantly lower rate of inconclusive results in white individuals in comparison with underrepresented minorities. This suggests greater clinical usefulness of genetic testing for cardiomyopathy in white persons in comparison with people of other racial/ethnic groups. This clear disparity warrants further study to understand the gaps in usefulness, which may derive from a lack of clinical testing and research in underrepresented minority populations, in the hopes of improving genetic testing outcomes for cardiomyopathy in nonwhite groups.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.