ArticleBiophysical journal2018
Quantitative Characterization of Metastability and Heterogeneity of Amyloid Aggregates.
Article in Biophysical journal, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- On the reversibility of amyloid fibril formation.Biophysics reviews · 2025Review
- Amyloid formation and depolymerization of tumor suppressor p16Nature communications · 2024Article
- Article
- Stability matters, too - the thermodynamics of amyloid fibril formation.Chemical science · 2022Review
- Hsp70 Inhibits Aggregation of IAPP by Binding to the Heterogeneous Prenucleation Oligomers.Biophysical journal · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Amyloids are heterogeneous assemblies of extremely stable fibrillar aggregates of proteins. Although biological activities of the amyloids are dependent on its conformation, quantitative evaluation of heterogeneity of amyloids has been difficult. Here we use disaggregation of the amyloids of tetramethylrhodamine-labeled Aβ (TMR-Aβ) to characterize its stability and heterogeneity. Disaggregation of TMR-Aβ amyloids, monitored by fluorescence recovery of TMR, was negligible in native buffer even at low nanomolar concentrations but the kinetics increased exponentially with addition of denaturants such as urea or GdnCl. However, dissolution of TMR-Aβ amyloids is different from what is expected in the case of thermodynamic solubility. For example, the fraction of soluble amyloids is found to be independent of total concentration of the peptide at all concentrations of the denaturants. Additionally, soluble fraction is dependent on growth conditions such as temperature, pH, and aging of the amyloids. Furthermore, amyloids undissolved in a certain concentration of the denaturant do not show any further dissolution after dilution in the same solvent; instead, these require higher concentrations of the denaturant. Taken together, our results indicate that amyloids are a heterogeneous ensemble of metastable states. Furthermore, dissolution of each structurally homogeneous member requires a unique threshold concentration of denaturant. Fraction of soluble amyloids as a function of concentration of denaturants is found to be sigmoidal. The sigmoidal curve becomes progressively steeper with progressive seeding of the amyloids, although the midpoint remains unchanged. Therefore, heterogeneity of the amyloids is a major determinant of the steepness of the sigmoidal curve. The sigmoidal curve can be fit assuming a normal distribution for the population of the amyloids of various kinetic stabilities. We propose that the mean and the standard deviation of the normal distribution provide quantitative estimates of mean kinetic stability and heterogeneity, respectively, of the amyloids in a certain preparation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.