Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29490082›Full record

Trial reportTranslational behavioral medicine2019

The impact of the interventionist-participant relationship on treatment adherence and weight loss.

Rebecca A Krukowski, Delia Smith West, Jeffrey Priest, Takamaru Ashikaga, Shelly Naud, Jean R Harvey

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Translational behavioral medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Adherence to Behavioral Weight Management: A Scoping Review of Definitions, Measurement, and Components.Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. A Review of Telemedicine Interventions for Weight Loss.Current cardiovascular risk reports · 2021
    Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Rebecca A KrukowskiDepartment of Preventive Medicine, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN 38105, USA.
Delia Smith WestDepartment of Exercise Science, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC 29208, USA.
Jeffrey PriestMedical Biostatistics, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT 05405, USA.
Takamaru AshikagaMedical Biostatistics, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT 05405, USA.
Shelly NaudMedical Biostatistics, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT 05405, USA.
Jean R HarveyDepartment of Nutrition and Food Sciences, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT 05405, USA.

Funding

INTERNET SUPPORT FOR LONG-TERM WEIGHT MAINTENANCER01DK056746 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT &ST AGRIC COLLEGE · PI HARVEY, JEAN R, WEST, DELIA SMITH · 2000 to 2019
$10.6M
NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK056746
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Little is known about the impact of the relationship built between interventionists and their participants on weight loss. Our objective is to determine whether stronger early (i.e., 4 weeks) participant-interventionist bond is associated with significantly greater weight loss success and treatment adherence. Three hundred and ninety-eight participants received an online group behavioral weight control program over 18 months. Weight was measured objectively at baseline and at 6 and 18 months. At 4 weeks, participants completed the Working Alliance Inventory (WAI) bonding subscale, which measures the collaborative bond with the interventionist. Adherence (i.e., session attendance and online self-monitoring diary completion) was recorded by the interventionists. Participant-interventionist bond at 4 weeks was significantly associated with weight loss at 6 months (t(322) = -2.14, p = .03) but not at 18 months (t(290) = 0.53, p = .60). The model indicated that participant-interventionist bond at 4 weeks was a significant predictor of adherence at 6 months (b = .063, standard error [SE] = .30, p = .04), and 6 month adherence was a significant predictor of weight loss at 6 months (b = -.594, SE = .049, p < .0001). The indirect effect of the WAI-Bond subscale was significant (b = -.037, p = .03, 95% confidence interval: -.074, -.002) and accounted for 54% of the total effect of participant-interventionist bond on weight loss. However, the total weight loss explained by WAI-Bond subscale was small (0.04 kg). Participant-interventionist bond between participant and interventionist is an early predictor of treatment adherence and weight loss success at 6 months; however, the degree of weight loss explained by participant-interventionist bond is small and was not maintained at 18 months.

Indexed as

Professional-Patient RelationsWeight LossWeight Reduction ProgramsBehavior TherapyFemaleHealth PersonnelHumansInternetMaleMiddle AgedObesityTelemedicineTherapy, Computer-AssistedTime FactorsTreatment Adherence and ComplianceTreatment OutcomeAdherenceAllianceInterventionistObesityWeight loss

Identifiers

PMID29490082
PMCPMC6417149

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.