Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29490074›Full record

ArticleNucleic acids research2018

Expanding RNA binding specificity and affinity of engineered PUF domains.

Yang-Yang Zhao, Miao-Wei Mao, Wen-Jing Zhang, Jue Wang, Hai-Tao Li, Yi Yang, Zefeng Wang, Jia-Wei Wu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nucleic acids research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Diversity and structural-functional insights of alpha-solenoid proteins.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2024
    Review
  7. Article
  8. DNA and RNA Binding Proteins: From Motifs to Roles in Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Programmable RNA manipulation in living cells.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2019
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Yang-Yang ZhaoCenter for Life Sciences, Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Protein Sciences, Beijing Advanced Innovation Center for Structural Biology, School of Life Sciences, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China.
Miao-Wei MaoCAS Key Laboratory of Computational Biology, CAS-MPG Partner Institute of Computational Biology, CAS Center for Excellence in Molecular Cell Science, Shanghai Institute of Biological Science, Shanghai 200031, China.
Wen-Jing ZhangInstitute of Cancer Stem Cell, Dalian Medical University, Dalian, Liaoning 116044, China.
Jue WangInstitute of Molecular Enzymology, Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu 215123, China.
Hai-Tao LiMinistry of Education Key Laboratory of Protein Sciences, Beijing Advanced Innovation Center for Structural Biology, Department of Basic Medical Sciences, School of Medicine, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China.
Yi YangSynthetic Biology and Biotechnology Laboratory, State Key Laboratory of Bioreactor Engineering, School of Pharmacy, East China University of Science and Technology, Shanghai 200237, China.
Zefeng WangCAS Key Laboratory of Computational Biology, CAS-MPG Partner Institute of Computational Biology, CAS Center for Excellence in Molecular Cell Science, Shanghai Institute of Biological Science, Shanghai 200031, China.
Jia-Wei WuCenter for Life Sciences, Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Protein Sciences, Beijing Advanced Innovation Center for Structural Biology, School of Life Sciences, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China.
East China University of Science and Technology · CNSoochow University · CNCenter for Excellence in Molecular Cell Science · CNCenter for Life Sciences · CNDalian Medical University · CNTsinghua University · CN

Funding

Artificial site-specific RNA endonuclease as new Myotonic Dystrophy therapeuticsR21AR061640 · NIAMS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI WANG, ZEFENG · 2011 to 2012
$358k
NIAMS NIH HHS R21 AR061640
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Specific manipulation of RNA is necessary for the research in biotechnology and medicine. The RNA-binding domains of Pumilio/fem-3 mRNA binding factors (PUF domains) are programmable RNA binding scaffolds used to engineer artificial proteins that specifically modulate RNAs. However, the native PUF domains generally recognize 8-nt RNAs, limiting their applications. Here, we modify the PUF domain of human Pumilio1 to engineer PUFs that recognize RNA targets of different length. The engineered PUFs bind to their RNA targets specifically and PUFs with more repeats have higher binding affinity than the canonical eight-repeat domains; however, the binding affinity reaches the peak at those with 9 and 10 repeats. Structural analysis on PUF with nine repeats reveals a higher degree of curvature, and the RNA binding unexpectedly and dramatically opens the curved structure. Investigation of the residues positioned in between two RNA bases demonstrates that tyrosine and arginine have favored stacking interactions. Further tests on the availability of the engineered PUFs in vitro and in splicing function assays indicate that our engineered PUFs bind RNA targets with high affinity in a programmable way.

Indexed as

Protein DomainsProtein EngineeringAlternative SplicingArginineBase SequenceHumansModels, MolecularProtein BindingRNARNA-Binding ProteinsTyrosineArgininePUM1 protein, humanRNARNA-Binding ProteinsTyrosine

Identifiers

PMID29490074
PMCPMC5961129
OpenAlexW2793183001

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.