Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29490060›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy2018

Actual versus 'ideal' antibiotic prescribing for common conditions in English primary care.

Koen B Pouwels, F Christiaan K Dolk, David R M Smith, Julie V Robotham, Timo Smieszek

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05286918 (Antibiotic Stewardship Through CRP-guided Antibiotic Treatment for Patients With Acute Exacerbation of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease), which is not on this map. Cited by 123 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
123citing papers in PubMed, 8 pooled it
13.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05286918 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Antibiotic Stewardship Through CRP-guided Antibiotic Treatment for Patients With Acute Exacerbation of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (AECOPD)

TypeinterventionalSponsorThe University of Hong KongRan2022 to 2026Enrolled1,184ConditionsAcute Exacerbation of COPD, Lung Diseases, Lung Diseases, Obstructive, Pulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveArmsThe intervention (CRP-guided) group
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

123 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 192 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Clinical presentation, microbiological aetiology and disease course in patients with flu-like illness: a post hoc analysis of randomised controlled trial data.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2022
    Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

63 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Koen B PouwelsModelling and Economics Unit, National Infection Service, Public Health England, London, UK.
F Christiaan K DolkModelling and Economics Unit, National Infection Service, Public Health England, London, UK.
David R M SmithModelling and Economics Unit, National Infection Service, Public Health England, London, UK.
Julie V RobothamModelling and Economics Unit, National Infection Service, Public Health England, London, UK.
Timo SmieszekModelling and Economics Unit, National Infection Service, Public Health England, London, UK.
Public Health England · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: Previous work based on guidelines and expert opinion identified 'ideal' prescribing proportions-the overall proportion of consultations that should result in an antibiotic prescription-for common infectious conditions. Here, actual condition-specific prescribing proportions in primary care in England were compared with ideal prescribing proportions identified by experts. Methods: All recorded consultations for common infectious conditions (cough, bronchitis, exacerbations of asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, sore throat, rhinosinusitis, otitis media, lower respiratory tract infection, upper respiratory tract infection, influenza-like illness, urinary tract infection, impetigo, acne, gastroenteritis) for 2013-15 were extracted from The Health Improvement Network (THIN) database. The proportions of consultations resulting in an antibiotic prescription were established, concentrating on acute presentations in patients without relevant comorbidities. These actual prescribing proportions were then compared with previously established 'ideal' proportions by condition. Results: For most conditions, substantially higher proportions of consultations resulted in an antibiotic prescription than was deemed appropriate according to expert opinion. An antibiotic was prescribed in 41% of all acute cough consultations when experts advocated 10%. For other conditions the proportions were: bronchitis (actual 82% versus ideal 13%); sore throat (actual 59% versus ideal 13%); rhinosinusitis (actual 88% versus ideal 11%); and acute otitis media in 2- to 18-year-olds (actual 92% versus ideal 17%). Substantial variation between practices was found. Conclusions: This work has identified substantial overprescribing of antibiotics in English primary care, and highlights conditions where this is most pronounced, particularly in respiratory tract conditions.

Indexed as

AdolescentAnti-Bacterial AgentsBronchitisChildChild, PreschoolComorbidityCoughEnglandGuideline AdherenceHumansInappropriate PrescribingOtitis MediaPharyngitisPractice Patterns, Physicians'SinusitisAnti-Bacterial Agents

Identifiers

PMID29490060
PMCPMC5890776
OpenAlexW2790027138

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.