ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2018
A global network of biomedical relationships derived from text.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 59 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
59 citing papers in PubMed.
- VITAGRAPH: building a knowledge graph for biologically relevant learning tasks.Scientific data · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence in drug research and development: a review of methods and applications in drug repurposing.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Review
- Knowledge-graph embeddings for osteoarthritis candidate prediction.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- Graph-Based Gene Embedding.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2026Article
- LLMs build inconsistent knowledge graphs from one immune-checkpoint corpus: a five-axis benchmark and consensus precision-coverage protocol.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
- medicX-KG: a knowledge graph for pharmacists' drug information needs.Journal of biomedical semantics · 2025Article
- A large language model framework for literature-based disease-gene association prediction.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2024Article
- PubTator 3.0: an AI-powered literature resource for unlocking biomedical knowledge.Nucleic acids research · 2024Article
- HGTDR: Advancing drug repurposing with heterogeneous graph transformers.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2024Article
- Biclustering data analysis: a comprehensive survey.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2024Review
- Elucidating the semantics-topology trade-off for knowledge inference-based pharmacological discovery.Journal of biomedical semantics · 2024Article
- AFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2024Article
- Knowledge Graphs and Their Applications in Drug Discovery.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2024Article
- Natural Language Processing for Drug Discovery Knowledge Graphs: Promises and Pitfalls.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2024Article
- A mitochondrial inside-out iron-calcium signal reveals drug targets for Parkinson's disease.Cell reports · 2023Article
- Advancing drug-target interaction prediction: a comprehensive graph-based approach integrating knowledge graph embedding and ProtBert pretraining.BMC bioinformatics · 2023Article
- From intuition to AI: evolution of small molecule representations in drug discovery.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2023Article
- Large-Scale Biomedical Relation Extraction Across Diverse Relation Types: Model Development and Usability Study on COVID-19.Journal of medical Internet research · 2023Article
- DrugMechDB: A Curated Database of Drug Mechanisms.Scientific data · 2023Article
- Staying Ahead of the Game: How SARS-CoV-2 has Accelerated the Application of Machine Learning in Pandemic Management.BioDrugs : clinical immunotherapeutics, biopharmaceuticals and gene therapy · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Motivation: The biomedical community's collective understanding of how chemicals, genes and phenotypes interact is distributed across the text of over 24 million research articles. These interactions offer insights into the mechanisms behind higher order biochemical phenomena, such as drug-drug interactions and variations in drug response across individuals. To assist their curation at scale, we must understand what relationship types are possible and map unstructured natural language descriptions onto these structured classes. We used NCBI's PubTator annotations to identify instances of chemical, gene and disease names in Medline abstracts and applied the Stanford dependency parser to find connecting dependency paths between pairs of entities in single sentences. We combined a published ensemble biclustering algorithm (EBC) with hierarchical clustering to group the dependency paths into semantically-related categories, which we annotated with labels, or 'themes' ('inhibition' and 'activation', for example). We evaluated our theme assignments against six human-curated databases: DrugBank, Reactome, SIDER, the Therapeutic Target Database, OMIM and PharmGKB. Results: Clustering revealed 10 broad themes for chemical-gene relationships, 7 for chemical-disease, 10 for gene-disease and 9 for gene-gene. In most cases, enriched themes corresponded directly to known database relationships. Our final dataset, represented as a network, contained 37 491 thematically-labeled chemical-gene edges, 2 021 192 chemical-disease edges, 136 206 gene-disease edges and 41 418 gene-gene edges, each representing a single-sentence description of an interaction from somewhere in the literature. Availability and implementation: The complete network is available on Zenodo (https://zenodo.org/record/1035500). We have also provided the full set of dependency paths connecting biomedical entities in Medline abstracts, with associated sentences, for future use by the biomedical research community. Supplementary information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.